<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Debate: A Recap of Sorts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://intelligentdiscontent.com/2006/05/04/the-debate-a-recap-of-sorts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://intelligentdiscontent.com/2006/05/04/the-debate-a-recap-of-sorts/</link>
	<description>Serving Up Snark Since 2005</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:10:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: 4&#38;20 blackbirds &#187; Blog Archive &#187; It&#8217;s time to go, Paul Richards</title>
		<link>http://intelligentdiscontent.com/2006/05/04/the-debate-a-recap-of-sorts/comment-page-1/#comment-5985</link>
		<dc:creator>4&#38;20 blackbirds &#187; Blog Archive &#187; It&#8217;s time to go, Paul Richards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 16:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intelligentdiscontent.com/2006/05/04/the-debate-a-recap-of-sorts/#comment-5985</guid>
		<description>[...] Pogie: Paul Richards has been a real dilemma for me throughout the race. I admire his passion, his beliefs, and his specific positions. He just doesn&#8217;t have a chance in this race, in part because the media has ignored him, and he is too far left for the state. Throughout the debate, he was the most impressive to me on issues, with specifics for reducing oil dependence and the need for war. Moderates and conservatives often deride liberal visions of the future as urealistic, but I will take Paul Richards&#8217; utopian hopes over the faith-based nightmare of the Bush Administration any day. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Pogie: Paul Richards has been a real dilemma for me throughout the race. I admire his passion, his beliefs, and his specific positions. He just doesn&rsquo;t have a chance in this race, in part because the media has ignored him, and he is too far left for the state. Throughout the debate, he was the most impressive to me on issues, with specifics for reducing oil dependence and the need for war. Moderates and conservatives often deride liberal visions of the future as urealistic, but I will take Paul Richards&rsquo; utopian hopes over the faith-based nightmare of the Bush Administration any day. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Left in the West &#187; Blog Archive &#187; People Still Want Answers</title>
		<link>http://intelligentdiscontent.com/2006/05/04/the-debate-a-recap-of-sorts/comment-page-1/#comment-5741</link>
		<dc:creator>Left in the West &#187; Blog Archive &#187; People Still Want Answers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2006 15:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intelligentdiscontent.com/2006/05/04/the-debate-a-recap-of-sorts/#comment-5741</guid>
		<description>[...] Last night, John Morrison said the Missoula Independent story on his affair and the resulting scandal was factually inaccurate. I wasn&#8217;t the only one who noted that Morrison won&#8217;t say what the inaccuracy is. Pogie caught that, too: On the ethics issue, he made a unsubstantiated claim that the Missoula Independent article was factually flawed, without saying how. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Last night, John Morrison said the Missoula Independent story on his affair and the resulting scandal was factually inaccurate. I wasn&#8217;t the only one who noted that Morrison won&#8217;t say what the inaccuracy is. Pogie caught that, too: On the ethics issue, he made a unsubstantiated claim that the Missoula Independent article was factually flawed, without saying how. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
