http://intelligentdiscontent.com/2006/05/10/morrisons-fact-check-on-the-tacke-affair/ Serving Up Snark Since 2005 Sun, 21 Mar 2010 20:47:49 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 http://intelligentdiscontent.com/2006/05/10/morrisons-fact-check-on-the-tacke-affair/comment-page-1/#comment-6430 Intelligent Discontent » Blog Archive » Jon Tester: The Best Choice on Tuesday (Our Endorsement) Fri, 02 Jun 2006 09:21:59 +0000 http://intelligentdiscontent.com/2006/05/10/morrisons-fact-check-on-the-tacke-affair/#comment-6430 [...] The CandidateJohn Tester has the best chance of defeating Conrad Burns in November. No question. While the polls say that both men would beat Burns today, it seems unlikely that Morrison will be able to prevail in the long run for two reasons. First, his own ethical lapeses will make it impossible for him to attack Burns’ most important vulnerability.  Frankly, he has been dishonest, evasive, and, according to the attorneys who formerly supported him, unethical. More importantly, it seems like Morrison won’t be able to handle a tough campaign. If anything, the Tester campaign has been criticized for being too soft on Morrison, and he hasn’t handled that challenge very well. From running from a public radio call-in show to really ineffective attacks against Jon Tester, Morrison just hasn’t show the kind of campaigning that will allow him to withstand the inevitable, relentless negativity from the Burns staff. [...] [...] The CandidateJohn Tester has the best chance of defeating Conrad Burns in November. No question. While the polls say that both men would beat Burns today, it seems unlikely that Morrison will be able to prevail in the long run for two reasons. First, his own ethical lapeses will make it impossible for him to attack Burns’ most important vulnerability.  Frankly, he has been dishonest, evasive, and, according to the attorneys who formerly supported him, unethical. More importantly, it seems like Morrison won’t be able to handle a tough campaign. If anything, the Tester campaign has been criticized for being too soft on Morrison, and he hasn’t handled that challenge very well. From running from a public radio call-in show to really ineffective attacks against Jon Tester, Morrison just hasn’t show the kind of campaigning that will allow him to withstand the inevitable, relentless negativity from the Burns staff. [...]

]]> http://intelligentdiscontent.com/2006/05/10/morrisons-fact-check-on-the-tacke-affair/comment-page-1/#comment-6159 Left in the West » Blog Archive » John Morrison: A Coward Who Thinks We’re Fools Mon, 22 May 2006 20:04:17 +0000 http://intelligentdiscontent.com/2006/05/10/morrisons-fact-check-on-the-tacke-affair/#comment-6159 [...] She also apparently has not made a copy available to Don Pogreba of Intelligent Discontent. He asked for a copy some time ago after reading in Queen City News that Gordon explained the document using the following sentence, “We basically did it for anyone who asked.” Ah, that would explain the decision to not give it to two media outlets who have requested it. Or, just maybe, Tylynn Gordon is being…ah…less-than-honest again? [...] [...] She also apparently has not made a copy available to Don Pogreba of Intelligent Discontent. He asked for a copy some time ago after reading in Queen City News that Gordon explained the document using the following sentence, “We basically did it for anyone who asked.” Ah, that would explain the decision to not give it to two media outlets who have requested it. Or, just maybe, Tylynn Gordon is being…ah…less-than-honest again? [...]

]]> http://intelligentdiscontent.com/2006/05/10/morrisons-fact-check-on-the-tacke-affair/comment-page-1/#comment-5871 Left in the West » Blog Archive » Eight Page Fract Check Thu, 11 May 2006 14:15:08 +0000 http://intelligentdiscontent.com/2006/05/10/morrisons-fact-check-on-the-tacke-affair/#comment-5871 [...] Pogie’s already tackled John Morrison’s “fact check” as reported by Cathy Siegner. From what I can see, Siegner’s writeup provides no evidence that Morrison is disputing his own heavy involvement in the case, as reported by John Adams. Pogie’s requesting a copy of the Fact Check document. [...] [...] Pogie’s already tackled John Morrison’s “fact check” as reported by Cathy Siegner. From what I can see, Siegner’s writeup provides no evidence that Morrison is disputing his own heavy involvement in the case, as reported by John Adams. Pogie’s requesting a copy of the Fact Check document. [...]

]]> http://intelligentdiscontent.com/2006/05/10/morrisons-fact-check-on-the-tacke-affair/comment-page-1/#comment-8633 Electric City Weblog Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000 http://intelligentdiscontent.com/2006/05/10/morrisons-fact-check-on-the-tacke-affair/#comment-8633 <!--%kramer-pre%-->guy has a great point<!--%kramer-post%--> guy has a great point

]]>