<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The IR On Its Debate Coverage: We Rock!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://intelligentdiscontent.com/2006/06/27/the-ir-on-its-debate-coverage-we-rock/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://intelligentdiscontent.com/2006/06/27/the-ir-on-its-debate-coverage-we-rock/</link>
	<description>Serving Up Snark Since 2005</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:10:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Eric Coobs</title>
		<link>http://intelligentdiscontent.com/2006/06/27/the-ir-on-its-debate-coverage-we-rock/comment-page-1/#comment-7269</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Coobs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2006 21:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intelligentdiscontent.com/2006/06/27/the-ir-on-its-debate-coverage-we-rock/#comment-7269</guid>
		<description>You don&#039;t have to brag about my complete, unbiased coverage Matt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You don&#8217;t have to brag about my complete, unbiased coverage Matt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pogie</title>
		<link>http://intelligentdiscontent.com/2006/06/27/the-ir-on-its-debate-coverage-we-rock/comment-page-1/#comment-7253</link>
		<dc:creator>Pogie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 20:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intelligentdiscontent.com/2006/06/27/the-ir-on-its-debate-coverage-we-rock/#comment-7253</guid>
		<description>Yeah, exactly. Unless there was something in the printed version of the IR that I missed, the AP was all they offered.

The part I don&#039;t get is that Lee has some talened political writers who can write critical analysis--I just don&#039;t seem them getting used too often.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, exactly. Unless there was something in the printed version of the IR that I missed, the AP was all they offered.</p>
<p>The part I don&#8217;t get is that Lee has some talened political writers who can write critical analysis&#8211;I just don&#8217;t seem them getting used too often.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Singer</title>
		<link>http://intelligentdiscontent.com/2006/06/27/the-ir-on-its-debate-coverage-we-rock/comment-page-1/#comment-7252</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Singer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 20:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intelligentdiscontent.com/2006/06/27/the-ir-on-its-debate-coverage-we-rock/#comment-7252</guid>
		<description>Perhaps most humorously, that story you quote is the AP story. From what I can tell, the Lee reporter who covered it was Michael Jamison of the Missoulian. None of the state bureau appears to have written about it.

I really need to write more posts lauding the coverage the blogs have given this race.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps most humorously, that story you quote is the AP story. From what I can tell, the Lee reporter who covered it was Michael Jamison of the Missoulian. None of the state bureau appears to have written about it.</p>
<p>I really need to write more posts lauding the coverage the blogs have given this race.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pogie</title>
		<link>http://intelligentdiscontent.com/2006/06/27/the-ir-on-its-debate-coverage-we-rock/comment-page-1/#comment-7251</link>
		<dc:creator>Pogie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 18:46:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intelligentdiscontent.com/2006/06/27/the-ir-on-its-debate-coverage-we-rock/#comment-7251</guid>
		<description>I sent my little contribution of fact checking to all the major dailies and the independent weeklies. I doubt the majors will be asking for any more input. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I sent my little contribution of fact checking to all the major dailies and the independent weeklies. I doubt the majors will be asking for any more input. <img src='http://intelligentdiscontent.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: touchstone</title>
		<link>http://intelligentdiscontent.com/2006/06/27/the-ir-on-its-debate-coverage-we-rock/comment-page-1/#comment-7250</link>
		<dc:creator>touchstone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 18:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intelligentdiscontent.com/2006/06/27/the-ir-on-its-debate-coverage-we-rock/#comment-7250</guid>
		<description>Ugh. You&#039;re joking! I&#039;ve been waiting and waiting to see if any of the papers would actual ANALYZE the debate, like fact check or something...

Grr.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ugh. You&#8217;re joking! I&#8217;ve been waiting and waiting to see if any of the papers would actual ANALYZE the debate, like fact check or something&#8230;</p>
<p>Grr.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
