New West (what is New West, anyway…a blog? a news site?) has an interesting article up on Tester’s personality and how it might influence this election.
I have two thoughts:
- I am tired of hearing from Craig Wilson, who seems like he is the pundit of choice in Montana political writing. I was stunned by his analysis of the Tester-Burns debate that appeared in The Hill that Burns helped himself when he used the word “liberal” in the debate several times. Good….encourage more name calling in this election.
- I think there is something to be said for Tester’s personality in this debate. I have met Tester twice and although I am sure that those meetings probably didn’t stick in Tester’s mind, they left quite an impression on me. He struck me as smart, well-spoken, honest and most of all, real. I was an adult voter the last two times Burns was reelected (94 and 2000) and although I was certainly supporting his opponents, I am not nearly as excited of the prospect of new blood than I am in this election. And…that 2000 election featured the introduction of Brian Schweitzer to the political scene. There is an energy among many of my fellow Democrats that I haven’t seen in quite some time. People are rising up WITH Jon Tester, not just AGAINST Conrad Burns. Will that matter? I hope so.
Related Posts:
See Jon Tester’s New TV AdTester’s Call for Burns’ ResignationTester’s victory speech online…
June 30th, 2006 at 7:40 am
Could we please find somebody besides Craig Wilson to comment on Montana politics and somebody besides Paul Polzin to comment on our economy!
June 30th, 2006 at 1:45 pm
I keep offering.
June 30th, 2006 at 1:54 pm
Good commentary isn’t hard to find - come over to my place and we’ll show you.