The Butte Debate: Did Burns Break the Law Again?

by Pogie on September 24, 2006 · 4 comments

in MT Politics,Senate Race 2006,Senator for Saginaw Chippewas,The Media

There’s been a lot of talk in the Montana blogs about the nature of the corporate sponsorship of the Butte debate last night. Touchstone led off the discussion, and Shane followed up with some great details about the connection between Burns and the Resodyn corporation. Apparently, in exchange for their ‘sponsorship’ of the debate, this corporation was given the ol’ first class treatment, being able to hold seats at the front of this public event, seats that were subsequently filled by Burns supporters. Just how bad was it? Jen reports that Larry Farrar himself, the corporate sponsor of the event, forced two elderly women from their seats if they refused to wear Burns stickers.

This is another violation of the law. Resodyn gave something of value (prime seats, in the center of the audience) to the Burns campaign–and that is a corporate donation, prohibited, as Chuck Denowh reminded us, by the law.

Conrad Burns acting unethically is hardly news these days, but the actions of the Standard require some serious scrutiny. Given the Standard’s frequent coverage of Burns-Resodyn connections and the ready availability of information about donations to Burns linked to Resodyn, how could it be an appropriate choice to have Resodyn sponsor the debate? Was the MT-GOP unavailable? I’ve written Gerry O’Brien ( Gerry.Obrien@lee.net) and Janet Taylor (janet.taylor@lee.net), from the Standard, as well as the generic Lee information e-mail (information@lee.net) with some questions, like:

  • What was the nature of the sponsorship agreement between the Standard and Resodyn?
  • Was anyone else able to purchase/reserve seats?
  • Was there a previous sponsor before Resodyn, and what motivated you to change, if so?

I think the more people who ask these types of questions, the better.

A little more information below the fold–about the web of connections between Burns and Resodyn.

A search for Resodyn on Conrad Burns campaign site reveals 14 hits, including:

And what does Resodyn say about Conrad?

No quid pro quo, right?

{ 4 comments… read them below or add one }

Shane Mason September 24, 2006 at 2:36 pm

Good details. I will follow your lead on emailing the papers. I will be very disappointed (though not suprised) if the Montana press doesn’ follow up on this.

Reply

Jen. That Jen. September 24, 2006 at 7:31 pm

Yes, yes, yes.

We must all keep the pressure on the Standar editorial board. If they think they can get away with this garbage without even being questioned, they’re crazy.

Jon Tester will win Butte, it’s only a question of by how much, and make no mistake, I am aiming for 72% of the vote. HOWEVER, the editorial board of the Standard is Chamber of Commerce lovers, and I feel them itching to endorse the Auctioneer from Missouri.

Write, call, tell others about this.

Dirty politics in Butte – do they honestly think that they are doing something here that we can’t handle? BRING IT.

Reply

Larry Kralj, Environmental Rangers! September 24, 2006 at 7:43 pm

What the hell happened to the OLD Butte? How did Burns and Resodyn get away with this?

Reply

Jen. That Jen. September 24, 2006 at 8:25 pm

Old Butte was put out of business. In a thrilling stroke of irony (or something), Resodyn and Fr. Farrar are housed in the old Montana Power, nee, Anaconda Copper Company building.

chilling, yes?

The repubs are a minority, but they are moneyed and loud.

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: