RSS

Quick debate notes…

I had Open House tonight at school and so I didn’t catch all of the debate, but I want to make a couple of quick notes of what I did hear:

1. Burns sounds awful. Between the stuttering, lack of subject-verb agreement or awkward phrasing, Burns is a shameful spokeman for Montana.

2. Why on Earth was Burns allowed to break the rules twice? Listen to the debate: Burns was allowed to respond to Tester twice after he was supposed to be done and when Tester asked to do the same, he was denied. IT IS NOT TOUGH: FOLLOW YOUR OWN ESTABLISHED RULES.

3. Tester was anywhere from average to very solid.

Related Posts:
  • CI-97 debate has been posted on the tube-net…
  • The Burns File: Deliberately Deceptive, or Just Plain Wrong?
  • Montana Senate debate coverage

    • Tue, Oct 17, 2006

    Jon Tester, MT Politics, Senate Race 2006, Senator for Saginaw Chippewas

    This post was written by:

    Jason - who has written 178 posts on Intelligent Discontent.


    Contact the author

    2 Comments For This Post

    1. Shane Mason Says:
      October 17th, 2006 at 8:08 pm

      Yes, I would say that he was as solid and strong as I have heard him, especially when it came to the questions on Iraq and Abromoff. He handled himself very well.

    2. Dan Says:
      October 17th, 2006 at 8:19 pm

      Sunshine and lightbulbs. Period.

    Leave a Reply

    Bad Behavior has blocked 1799 access attempts in the last 7 days.