RSS

The Press, Again

  • Written by: PogieOctober 23rd, 2006
  • Comments:No Comment
  • Category:The Media
  • Rating:
    1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
    Loading ... Loading ...

The IR’s headline for this AP piece by Matt Gouras, like the story, gets it half right: “Campaign spin: Keeping facts straight no easy task.” They forgot the “So we don’t really try all that hard” part.

The most egregious lie the Burns campaign has made has been about his travel schedule?  What about:

  • his claims about embryonic stem cell research
  • his claim that UN troops are in Afghanistan
  • his connection to Abramoff
  • his assertion that chemical weapons have been found in Iraq
  • his claim that the 2005 Energy Bill heavily promoted renewables
  • his claim that he has never voted for a tax increase
  • his votes against increases for Pell Grants

Apparently, looking into those “was no easy task.”

As for the sales tax issue, Matt writes:

Burns has said in the past he would consider a national sales tax or a flat-rate income tax as part of overall tax reform that would eliminate all other taxes.

Charles Johnson, on Saturday, wrote:

Burns said he filled out a questionnaire saying he would be willing to look at a national sales tax that would eliminate all other taxes, but had made no commitment to support one until he saw the details.

Yet, Burns filled these questions out on the NTU survey:

6. MAJOR TAX REFORM. I will work and vote to repeal the entire federal Tax Code and completely replace it.

[x ] YES [ ] NO [ ] UNDECIDED

7. TAX REFORM CHOICE. If you answered Yes to Question 6, please state reforms you will support
(check one or more):

[x] A national retail sales tax that provides reasonable protection for low-income people, with a U.S. Constitutional Amendment to abolish and prohibit all federal income taxes after a transition period.

[x ] A single, low, flat-rate income tax with a large exemption for each taxpayer and dependent, with a U.S. Constitutional Amendment to prohibit more than one income tax rate.

It might be easier to keep the facts straight if you weren’t spun like a top by the Burns people. If he’s not responsible for his own words, on this survey or elswhere, then how can you fact check anything?

It’s not balanced reporting to say both sides are being dishonest when one is much worse than the other. It’s another lie.

Related Posts:
  • Who the hell is the “Eastern liberal press?”
  • Not important, but telling…
  • Fox News on Irresponsible Journalism
  • Mon, Oct 23, 2006

    The Media

    This post was written by:

    Pogie - who has written 1059 posts on Intelligent Discontent.

    I am an English and debate teacher from Helena, MT.

    Contact the author

    Leave a Reply

    Bad Behavior has blocked 1800 access attempts in the last 7 days.