January 2007

You come across some unusual things in the NYT archives every now and again:

On the rolling prairie that rises up here to become the wall known as the Rocky Mountains a few miles away, Mark Taliaferro points toward the field where the carcass of a cow was recently found. ”It is not a natural death,” said Mr. Taliaferro, a cattleman who has been ranching in north-central Montana for more than 25 years. ”When you see it, I tell you, it makes a believer out of you that something weird is going on.”

Eight cow killings have been reported in Montana since June 12, the most recent on Aug. 31. And they all appear similar to the ones that occurred in the 1970′s.

For ranchers and law enforcement officials in this remote part of Montana, the last few weeks have dredged up those memories. For several years the prairie country along the east front of mountains was rocked by dozens of cattle deaths in which the carcasses were mutilated. Some law enforcement officials and veterinarians who investigated said they had never seen anything like it.

”We had a bunch of them,” said Pete Howard, the Choteau County justice of the peace, who was sheriff when the first mutilations hit their peak. ”I’ve lived in this county all my life and worked on ranches and seen plenty of dead animals, but never did I see an animal with its face mask removed like that.”

Brian Schweitzer, a cattle rancher near Whitefish, Mont., who was the unsuccessful Democratic candidate for the United States Senate last year, recently found one of his cows killed in the same inexplicable way as the others. ”The brand inspector said it was lightning,” Mr. Schweitzer said, ”but there was no lightning that night. And it very much looked like those incisions were done with instruments. But I said fine, there’s a lot of things I can’t explain.” Mr. Schweitzer valued the loss of one grown steer at about $850.

The Administration to authorize the killing of Iranians found in Iraq, as part of a deliberate policy of confrontation against Iran may be a nominee for worst idea ever, depending on how it all plays out.
But the best part is that, at a time when Iran is forming closer ties with Latin American nations already frusterated with Ameican arrogance, we have demonstrated our extreme arrogance. Without any apparent involvement from the government to whom we supposedly handed power, we declare their country a kill-zone for nationals of the most powerful neighboring nation.
Call me old fashioned, but I’ve always thought that ‘confrontation’ was an unfortunate by-product of acheiving pressing policy goals, not a strategy in and of itself.

The Administration's plan to authorize the killing of Iranians found in Iraq, as part of a deliberate policy of confrontation against Iran, may be a nominee for worst idea ever, depending on how it all plays out.

But the best part is that, at a time when Iran is forming closer ties with Latin American nations already frusterated with Ameican arrogance, we have demonstrated our extreme arrogance. Without any apparent involvement from the government to whom we supposedly handed power, we declare their country a kill-zone for nationals of the most powerful neighboring nation.

Call me old fashioned, but I've always thought that 'confrontation' was an unfortunate by-product of acheiving pressing policy goals, not a strategy in and of itself.

Keep Reading

I’d pay cash to someone who can tell me what the hell this editorial actually stands for or against.

Billings Republican Mike Lange wants to amend the Montana Constitution, adding the following:

Parents have the right to the custody of their minor children and the right to control and direct their education, religious training, social training and contacts, and general upbringing. These rights may not be infringed by the state or a political subdivision of the state without a compelling state interest of the highest order. Failure to mention a right of a parent in this section does not exclude another right of parents regarding their children. This section applies to parents whose marriage has been dissolved to the extent possible. The legislature may implement this section by appropriate legislation.

This is a bad bill, and it was a bad bill when it was proposed with almost the same wording in Colorado ten years ago. While the Legislature does not have the direct power to amend the Constitution, Lange’s bill and the apparent endorsement of the Republican Party demonstrate clearly that their priorities are not those of the people of Montana. What’s more, they are bad lawmakers, not to mention not terribly creative. This incredibly broad constitutional wording presents a number of concerns. The language of the amendment would place an incredible burden on state social service workers trying to remove children from abusive homes, open the door for religious practice that conflicts with the law, and decrease children’s access to critical counseling services.

The biggest impact will be felt in education. Though Lange tells the Billings Gazette that the proposed legislation will not impact the requirement of compulsory education, the bill will contribute to a hostile atmosphere in education, with parents constitutionally entitled to question and change any element of education they see fit.

The People for the American Way note that proposed legal changes like the Parents Bill of Rights are cover to attack issues that the right wing finds objectionable in schools:

The truth is that school districts around the country are already under great pressure to eliminate sexuality education programs and health clinics, as well as literature ranging from Halloween stories to works by such authors as Mark Twain and Maya Angelou…such efforts will be more likely end up in court or whether they will instead be resolved through intimidation at the classroom level to the satisfaction of schoolbook censors, neither alternative is particularly attractive.

The last thing we need to do is make it easier for the social minority to impose its agenda on the schools. They have already had a chilling effect on science, health, and even literature curriculum. Montanans would do well not to legally enshrine the rights of this minority to control our education.

Make no mistake, I think parents should be involved in education. Personally, I love having the input of parents and invite them to attend my classroom. That’s positive interaction. This proposed amendment, however, goes too far, giving parents essentially unquestioned rights to challenge educational materials, delivery techniques, and requirements.

I know I shouldn’t do it…every time I go to a story linked on Drudge I get really, really annoyed.

But…

I am up past my bedtime and I am surfing news pages and happen to end up on Drudge.  The current outrage?  The Weather Channel is turning political!!!

Among the links is this one to ultra-balanced “WorldNetDaily” about the slow drift of the once-respected Weather Channel to a cog in the vast liberal media conspiracy.  “Melanie Morgan” (that’s a fake name, right?) writes:

The Weather Channel is now engaged in a con job on the American people, attempting to scare the public that their actions are destroying the planet by creating a global warming crisis.
The move away from scientific forecasting of the weather to sensationalized leftist political advocacy is in part due to the influence of Wonya Lucas, executive vice president and general manager of The Weather Channel Networks.

Gasp!

The best part is the juxtaposition of global warming as being different than “scientific.”  Newsflash: global warming?  There is little doubt of its existence to scientists.

Iraq War: Can We Actually Have a Debate?

19 January 2007

Peggy Noonan simultaneously offers a reasonable position on politics and the war and imagines that we have another President, one capable of admitting that he has made mistakes: It’s been an era of soft thinking and hard words. Those who opposed the war were weak and craven; those who supported it were dupes and bullies; [...]

Read the full article →

Voting? We Can’t Have Too Much of That…

18 January 2007

House Republicans are introducing two bills today to help restrict access to voting by eliminating Montana’s highly successful same-day registration. Tom McGillvray (R-Billings) wants to restrict registration to four days before an election and require “proof of citizenship,” in the form of a birth certificate, passport, or tribal ID card. Rick Jore (Crazy-Ronan), wants to [...]

Read the full article →

Why the Surprise?

15 January 2007

Since the civil rights act, people black and white and of all levels of education have been pondering and debating- Why, with the end of de jure segregation, does de facto segregation continue? Why, if the American dream is attainable, have black people by and large not attained it? The answer to this question seems [...]

Read the full article →

Senate Bill 15: A Fine Sentiment, But Bad Idea

14 January 2007

Both Jay and Colby have written in support of Senate Bill 15, which would prohibit protesting at funerals. While I agree that the proposed law is based on a laudable desire to protect families from additional emotional distress at the time of the loss of a loved one, its overly broad writing and troubling rationale [...]

Read the full article →

The GOP: In Touch with American Workers and Families

12 January 2007

In the debate about raising the minimum wage, Republican Jack Kingston, who decried the bitter damage that would be done to his family if he were forced to work a full week, argued that people living in poverty have an easy answer? Work more. Laurel Republican Dan McGee wants to repeal the two month old [...]

Read the full article →

Republican to voters: “Screw you”

12 January 2007

You know, I still don’t know exactly where I stand on lobbying.  I understand how the system works, but the reality is, I am disgusted in the amount of money that goes into elections and much of that comes from lobbyists and their clients. Nonetheless, I think the voters were clear in their intent in [...]

Read the full article →