Another Bold Editorial Stand from the IR
- Written by: PogieJanuary 24th, 2007
- Comments:3 Comments
- Category:The Media
- Rating:
(No Ratings Yet)
Loading ...
I’d pay cash to someone who can tell me what the hell this editorial actually stands for or against.
Related Posts:Wed, Jan 24, 2007
3 Comments For This Post
Leave a Reply
- Tester-Burns Debate
- A Somewhat Cynical Observation about Mansfield-Metcalf
- Montana's Max: Nutcakes!
- Dennis Rehberg: Master of the Oblivious
- Off to See Hillary and Obama
- Idaho Anti Wolf Coalition Falls Short (21)
- Blogs and the Media: Kemmick and Crisp (17)
- Tester-Burns Debate (14)
- The conscience of a liberal: why I am considering abstaining in the Iraqi War Referendum vote... (14)
- The Religious Right's Trump Card Exposed (13)
- Why Does Jake Eaton Want to Disenfranchise My Students?
- The Sorry State of Politics Practiced by the Montana GOP and Its Surrogates: A Soccer Story
- Questions and One Thought After the GOP’s Last Day
- Fixing Failing by Predetermining Passing
- Rehberg’s 14 Minutes and the Media’s Response: Which Was Worse?
- Some More Thoughts About Denny’s Stunt in Washington
- DHS now officially seizing and searching laptops
- NorthWestern Energy makes me sick
- I just lost my appetite
- McCain confuses Somalia and the Sudan
January 24th, 2007 at 1:51 pm
The strongest stance is one you can dodge…
January 24th, 2007 at 5:31 pm
I like that the article has 5 paragraphs, three of them starting with words reversing the previous paragraph. “but…” “Still…” “Nevertheless…”
January 25th, 2007 at 9:35 pm
Lord. This goes back to the last what-in-the-hell editorial endorsing (or not endorsing) two candidates for Lewis & Clark county commissioner (if I recall correctly).