April 2008

Though I would have preferred that Barack Obama not appear for an interview on a network that is openly hostile to Democratic candidates, for the most part he seems to have done well dealing with a much more hostile interview than, say, the President of the United States might have faced.

That being said, a few of Obama’s remarks were surprising and a bit disappointing.

OBAMA:Well, I think there are a whole host of areas where Republicans in some cases may have a better idea.

WALLACE: Such as?

OBAMA: Well, on issues of regulation. I think that back in the ’60s and ’70s a lot of the way we regulated industry was top-down command and control, we’re going to tell businesses exactly how to do things.

And you know, I think that the Republican Party and people who thought about the markets came up with the notion that, “You know what? If you simply set some guidelines, some rules and incentives, for businesses — let them figure out how they’re going to, for example, reduce pollution,” and a cap and trade system, for example is a smarter way of doing it, controlling pollution, than dictating every single rule that a company has to abide by, which creates a lot of bureaucracy and red tape and oftentimes is less efficient.

That’s just flatly wrong. Market-based regulation certainly hasn’t worked for pharmaceuticals. It hasn’t worked for meat processing. It certainly hasn’t worked in the financial sector, as recent events make abundantly clear.

More broadly, I don’t understand why Obama is promoting a right wing framework that positions Democrats as the defenders of failed, big government regulation and Republicans as the defenders of a mean, lean, efficient combination of government and the private sector. The reality is, and has been for some time, that Republicans are unwilling to impose sensible government regulation to protect the American people. The only thing mean about the Republican framework is the lean protection it offers Americans.

For one election, can Democrats please fight the urge to concede the core issues to the Republicans? Americans are tired of a government that puts the interests of corporations ahead of the interests of the people. Let’s fight for those values instead of sliding away from them.

When this and this are not atypical, but the most common type of post on the Kos front page, I think the site has started revving up the boat to jump the shark. I read Kos because I want insight about making the Democratic Party more successful and more progressive, not because I want to read relentless and often juvenile remarks about one candidate.

I am an Obama supporter. I wrote as much months ago. When, as a supporter, I find myself increasingly frustrated with the bitter, divisive attacks on Hillary Clinton by progressive bloggers, maybe it’s time to reevaluate the strategy.

Essentially, the Kos position seems to be:

  • Democratic candidates need to fight hard to win, unless they are Hillary Clinton.
  • that the Democratic Party’s rules on nomination are AWESOME when it comes to Florida and Michigan, but EVIL when it comes to super delegates.
  • that it’s perfectly acceptable to descend to the Faux News strategy of bleating the same idea repeatedly to drive one candidate out of the race.

If those of us on the Left or, even worse, Senator Obama, think that Hillary Clinton is being too tough on him in this primary season, then our chances are over in November. Come this summer, the nominee will be facing people who turned a decorated veteran into a war criminal and draft dodger against someone who was both of those things. It’s going to get much rougher than this.

Sometimes, in my more cynical moments, I think all of this is calculated to be able to blame Senator Clinton in the event that Democrats lose in 2008. That way, we won’t have to confront the institutional failures of our side one more time.

We’ve got two great candidates–both better than John McCain. Senator Obama can make this easy. He just needs to win out. We shouldn’t be trying to push one player off the field before the game’s over.

Operation Chaos? Please.

More like Operation Delusions of Self-Important Grandeur.

I suspect the nine readers of Mr. Hammond’s site will certainly have a profound impact on the Democratic primary. After all, look what a huge impact they had on the last few statewide races.

On a side note, do the Montanan papers have some kind of internal requirement to write about the inane ramblings of one entirely illogical, Rush Limbaugh parroting blog ever year?

It makes sense that an Orwellian proposal would involve some delightful double speak to accompany it. As Whitefish High School considers a proposal to conduct drug tests on all students involved in extra-curricular activities, the proposal’s defenders don’t want you to get the wrong idea: it’s not a violation of rights, it’s an opportunity:

On the one side is a gathering of coaches, teachers and concerned citizens who “want to give these kids another opportunity to ‘just say no,’ ” in the words of athletic director Jackie Fuller. “We’ve been researching this for some time now as coaches, about six years now, and we’re convinced it’s the right thing to do.”

While encouraging students to not use drugs is certainly valuable, there are certainly better approaches available than both denying students the right to privacy and teaching them that government agencies have the right to search them without consent or probable cause. It’s a knee jerk reaction driven by fear and false information, something proponents of the plan acknowledge:

One major impetus for this latest discussion was a survey showing that more than 90 percent of Whitefish High School students had tried marijuana.

It was shocking, to say the least. And it was absolutely untrue.

The survey, it seems, had been misread, and in fact the percentage was less than half of what was initially reported…

Maybe deficient reading skills would be a better crisis to respond to.

Despite the headline, this is a great sign in Jim Hunt’s effort to send Dennis Rehberg back to his subdivided ranch:

Democrat Jim Hunt topped incumbent Congressman Denny Rehberg in this quarter’s campaign finance reports.

Hunt, who entered the race in February, reported raising about $133,000. Rehberg, a Republican, reported raising about $107,000.

Clearly a long way to go, but a great sign.

While it was certainly gratifying to hear so many Montana political leaders talk about how proud they are to be Democrats last night, it was interesting to see how many of them minimized their party affiliation on their campaign signs. There were an awful lot of tiny donkeys and tiny font sizes on the banners at the event. In fact, some did not even note that the candidate was a Democrat at all.

We’re certainly not going to restore the Democratic Party to state-wide leadership and respect if we’re afraid to tell people we are Democrats. We are, and always have been, the party of the majority in this country. We’re the party of workers, the elderly, children, the middle class. We’ll never regain that majority if we’re not proud of what our party should represent.

The best example of how our candidates should act might be seen in our national officeholders. To some extent, Max Baucus’s campaign site says as much about the Senator as anything else does. By contrast, Jon Tester, who won a hard-fought fight for the Senate by energizing the Democratic Party, has a slightly different page.

Were Mike Mansfield or Lee Metcalf ever embarrassed to be Democrats? I think not. Nor should we be.

Off to See Hillary and Obama

5 April 2008

Bookmark on Delicious Digg this post Recommend on Facebook Buzz it up share via Reddit Share with Stumblers Tweet about it Subscribe to the comments on this post Print for later Tell a friend

Read the full article →

Montana’s Max: Nutcakes!

4 April 2008

Senator Max Baucus, who never met a trade deal he didn’t like, has a great deal of respect for people, both left and right, who have concerns about free trade agreements: He said people do want the right thing, even if they’re not sure what that is on complex issues. He told business leaders at [...]

Read the full article →

The Missoula Independent’s Embarrassing Rehberg Story

3 April 2008

Wow. I suppose it’s ironic that a few days after a little dustup with the owner of the Missoula Independent about quality reporting and the response of blogs, I came across the Independent’s recent obsequious, fawning portrayal of Dennis Rehberg. Frankly, it’s a pretty unbelievable story. Framed as a question about the likelihood of anyone [...]

Read the full article →

What Is Montana’s Most Important Resource?

2 April 2008

Roy Brown says he wants to adequately fund Montana schools…sometime. Not, of course, when he served in the Legislature, nor when his Party adopted an extremist agenda about education during the last Legislative session, nor during a time of large surpluses in state budgets. In fact, rather than advocate for more school funding, he and [...]

Read the full article →

President Clinton’s Speech in Helena

2 April 2008

A few delayed thoughts about President Clinton’s speech in Helena yesterday: The short version: Clinton is every bit as charismatic and engaging as he was when running for office himself. From the outset, he received a very warm response from the crowd, which could probably be best described as partisan, but not necessarily pro-Clinton. He [...]

Read the full article →

With Us Or Against Us

1 April 2008

Kos, in his continuing Chris Matthews impersonation that has become increasingly unbearable, about Hillary Clinton today: Clinton personifies the worst of the “with us, or against us”-type thinking that has gotten us in trouble with the rest of the world. Today, at the Clinton event in Helena, one of my colleagues ran into a group [...]

Read the full article →