<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Republican Logic at the Legislature: Hands Off Health Care, Hands on Uteruses</title>
	<atom:link href="http://intelligentdiscontent.com/2009/02/20/republican-logic-at-the-legislature-hands-off-health-care-hands-on-uteruses/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://intelligentdiscontent.com/2009/02/20/republican-logic-at-the-legislature-hands-off-health-care-hands-on-uteruses/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 00:36:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Golda Flieller</title>
		<link>http://intelligentdiscontent.com/2009/02/20/republican-logic-at-the-legislature-hands-off-health-care-hands-on-uteruses/comment-page-1/#comment-71102</link>
		<dc:creator>Golda Flieller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 23:39:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intelligentdiscontent.com/2009/02/20/republican-logic-at-the-legislature-hands-off-health-care-hands-on-uteruses/#comment-71102</guid>
		<description>I have been examinating out some of your articles and i can claim nice stuff. I will surely bookmark your site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been examinating out some of your articles and i can claim nice stuff. I will surely bookmark your site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evelyn</title>
		<link>http://intelligentdiscontent.com/2009/02/20/republican-logic-at-the-legislature-hands-off-health-care-hands-on-uteruses/comment-page-1/#comment-47147</link>
		<dc:creator>Evelyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 23:26:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intelligentdiscontent.com/2009/02/20/republican-logic-at-the-legislature-hands-off-health-care-hands-on-uteruses/#comment-47147</guid>
		<description>Argh!  The hypocrisy drives me crazy.  I wish Obama would take a look at the HCFA plan because I think it&#039;s a good transition to public healthcare.  Health Care for America is put together by the political scientist Jacob Hacker with the support of the Economic Policy Institute. I’d suggest reading &lt;a href=&quot;http://thinkingbigthebook.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Thinking Big&lt;/a&gt;  for a better summary of the plan, but the basic idea is that employers pay money into a public fund, enough to cover their workers.  The public fund gives quality coverage including preventive care.  Workers either keep insurance, choose a different private plan, or join a public health insurance plan without a private insurer middleman,  and pick their providers and doctors.  If it&#039;s too much for employers to provide the coverage the law requires they enroll their workers in the public plan at a modest cost.  HCFA and Medicare would function as a single nationwide insurance pool covering around half the population.  So ...  either the public plan attracts most Americans, and our system evolves into single-payer OR because the floor prevents a race to the bottom, the public-private competition raises the bar on care, cuts costs, even in the private insurance plans.  The standards would have to be kept by a strong government watchdog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Argh!  The hypocrisy drives me crazy.  I wish Obama would take a look at the HCFA plan because I think it&#8217;s a good transition to public healthcare.  Health Care for America is put together by the political scientist Jacob Hacker with the support of the Economic Policy Institute. I’d suggest reading <a href="http://thinkingbigthebook.com/" rel="nofollow">Thinking Big</a>  for a better summary of the plan, but the basic idea is that employers pay money into a public fund, enough to cover their workers.  The public fund gives quality coverage including preventive care.  Workers either keep insurance, choose a different private plan, or join a public health insurance plan without a private insurer middleman,  and pick their providers and doctors.  If it&#8217;s too much for employers to provide the coverage the law requires they enroll their workers in the public plan at a modest cost.  HCFA and Medicare would function as a single nationwide insurance pool covering around half the population.  So &#8230;  either the public plan attracts most Americans, and our system evolves into single-payer OR because the floor prevents a race to the bottom, the public-private competition raises the bar on care, cuts costs, even in the private insurance plans.  The standards would have to be kept by a strong government watchdog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

