As I noted earlier in the week, Republican Senate President Bob Story claims that expanding the state’s CHIP program would be too expensive, costing $35 million dollars.

Putting aside Senator Story’s questionable accounting and willful decision to pretend that the CHIP program wouldn’t trigger millions in federal matching funds,one can only assume that Senator Story will soon be writing editorials to Montana newspapers criticizing Senator Roy Brown’s latest effort to exempt businesses from the business tax, which will cost roughly $50 million annually:

Last week, the Senate Tax Committee heard yet another proposal, SB 490 by Sen. Roy Brown (R-Billings). Brown’s bill proposed to increase the tax exemption on business equipment from $20,000 to $5 million, a change that would take thousands of Montana businesses off the equipment tax rolls (leaving only 100 to continue paying, albeit with the $5 million exemption in pocket), reduce the business equipment slice of the property tax pie from 7% to 4%, and cost the state $50 million annually in lost tax revenue.

It is about priorities.

(Check out Session 61, an informative blog about the the current session.)

Article by

Don is from Shelby, MT (Go Coyotes!) and has lived in Montana his whole life. He teaches English and Debate in Helena, MT, and does most of his writing far too late at night.

{ 16 comments… read them below or add one }

jhwygirl March 8, 2009 at 12:54 pm

Brown campaigned on this issue and it didn’t get him anywhere.

I’d admire the tenacity, but it just comes off as asshole-like.

Reply

Craig Moore March 8, 2009 at 2:03 pm

Pogie you say, “It is about priorities.” I couldn’t agree more.

Small business represents about 80% of the jobs. Small business sustains most of Montana cities and towns. The economic downturn is making “Closing” signs appear everywhere. We all lose with each closure. Anything that alleviates the cost pressures, like addressing the equipment tax, when revenue streams dwindle is an urgent priority to keep our communities going. Juxtaposing CHIP vs. the business equipment tax is irrelevant to those community needs that are dependent on sustainable commercial enterprise.

Reply

Carla Augustad March 8, 2009 at 11:00 pm

I don’t believe that businesses will have to close because their taxes weren’t eliminated.

Many times, business equipment will reduce or eliminate the need to hire employees. Have you ever watched one of those forest machines do what used to provide employment to a whole crew of men?

It is about priorities.

Reply

Pogie March 8, 2009 at 11:54 pm

Is the current business tax really so burdensome on small businesses?

Senator Brown never adequately answered Governor Schweitzer’s argument about the impact of eliminating the business tax on county governments, either.

Maybe Republicans should bring this issue to the voters. :)

Reply

Craig Moore March 9, 2009 at 8:50 am

Hi Carla! Small towns just don’t have anything analogous to those logging machines. I grew up in a small town. Our success was based on putting politics aside and turning sholder-to-shoulder to stand together to meet community challenges. Our failures arose when we pulled against each other.

Businesses close for a variety of reasons including the inability to meet fixed costs. Business taxes that are a ‘piece of the action’ that rise and fall based on success are not the problem. When those taxes are fixed, such as property taxes, they are just one more factor leading to closing down when small business cannot ride out difficult times.

Reply

Craig Moore March 10, 2009 at 9:07 am

See: http://www.flatheadbeacon.com/articles/article/deal_reached_on_chip_initiative_money/8766/

==============
HELENA – Republicans and Democrats brokered a House budget deal Monday that calls for full funding of the children’s health insurance initiative that was approved last fall by voters — and promises quick action on a normally contentious issue.

Members of the House Appropriations Committee hailed an easy voice vote, with no debate, on the state’s main spending plan as a historic work of bipartisanship.
==================

It seems that House D’s and R’s are now holding hands over CHIP.

Reply

Molly Severtson March 11, 2009 at 7:47 am

Hi Pogie,

I’m the Project Coordinator at The Policy Institute, the organization that produces Session 61. Thanks for the link here. Any chance you would consider adding us to your “Montana Blogs” list too? Also check out our main site when you get the chance: http://www.thepolicyinstitute.us.

Thanks so much!
Molly

Reply

Molly Severtson March 17, 2009 at 9:09 am

Thank you! Eric says hi.

Reply

Lettie Levreau January 23, 2012 at 6:59 am

*Would you be interested in exchanging links?

Reply

Donette Vong February 3, 2012 at 2:15 pm

Great page, I actually enjoyed reading it, keep up all the hard writing.

Reply

Tennille Kava February 4, 2012 at 8:52 am

Enjoyable page, I genuinely enjoyed studying it, keep doing the good writing.

Reply

Joel Stassinos February 4, 2012 at 11:17 pm

Enjoyable article, I genuinely enjoyed studying it, keep up all the hard writing.

Reply

Mistie Rusten February 5, 2012 at 3:41 am

Fun feature, I genuinely benefited from glossing over it, keep doing all the good work.

Reply

Trinidad Schachsieck February 7, 2012 at 5:59 am

Fantastic feature, I genuinely enjoyed studying it, keep up the hard thoughts.

Reply

Tyrone Duda February 7, 2012 at 5:23 pm

Fantastic article, I genuinely enjoyed reading it, keep doing the hard work.

Reply

Wiley Cabrero February 7, 2012 at 9:49 pm

Enjoyable feature, I surprisingly enjoyed glossing over it, keep doing the hard writing.

Reply

Leave a Comment

{ 1 trackback }

Previous post:

Next post: