Dennis is so excited about yesterday. He was pretending to have read the House health care bill, doling out bits of “sunshine” as he feverishly read through through the text, exposing its nefarious schemes to socialize American life. Rehberg was excited, the Montana media was excited, and the Park County Republicans had to clean up after themselves:

Rep. Denny Rehberg (R-MT) went to town on Facebook and Twitter in Sarah Palin fashion yesterday, exposing the nearly 2000 page Pelosi-care bill that was “unveiled” in a closed-to-the-public ceremony the other day. What wasn’t unveiled in that event was put under a spotlight on Rep. Rehberg’s page.

You know was most excited, though? Probably Rush Limbaugh and the insurance company executives that Rehberg cribbed his comments from, many of which were flat out lies.

Let’s put Rehberg’s posts on Facebook side by side with the transcript of Limbaugh’s program yesterday, and see how much independent thinking Representative Rehberg was really doing.

Rehberg Limbaugh
Page 297 imposes a tax on all individuals who do not purchase “bureaucrat-approved” health insurance Page 297 — Section 501: “Imposes a 2.5 percent tax on all individuals who do not purchase ‘bureaucrat-approved’ health insurance — the tax would apply on individuals with incomes under $250,000, thus breaking a central promise of then-Senator Obama’s presidential campaign.”
Page 225 permits *but does not require* Members of Congress to enroll in government-run health care Page 225 — Section 330: “Permits — but does not require — Members of Congress to enroll in government-run health care.”  So they’ll be able to opt out of it and maintain their Cadillac plans.
Page 94 prohibits sale of private individual health insurance policies forcing you to go through fed government Page 94, Pelosi plan: “Prohibits the sale of private individual health insurance policies, beginning in 2013, forcing individuals to purchase coverage through the federal government.”  In 2013, after the 2012 presidential election.  In 2013, there is no private insurance allowed.  The sale of it will be prohibited.
Page 211 establishes new gov’t-run health plan that may cause as many as 114 million to lose existing coverage Page 211 — Section 321: “Establishes a new government-run health plan that, according to non-partisan actuaries at the Lewin Group, would cause as many as 114 million Americans to lose their existing coverage.”
Page 313 imposes 8% “tax on jobs” on firms that can’t afford “bureaucrat-approved” health coverage Page 313 — Section 512: “Imposes an 8 percent ‘tax on jobs’ for firms that cannot afford to purchase ‘bureaucrat-approved’ health coverage; according to an analysis by Harvard Professor Kate Baicker, such a tax would place millions ‘at substantial risk of unemployment’ — with minority workers losing their jobs at twice the rate of their white counterparts.”
Page 520 cuts more than $150 billion from Medicare Advantage plans, hurting at least 26,000 Montana seniors Page 520 — Section 1161: “Cuts more than $150 billion from Medicare Advantage plans.”
Page 336 imposes a half-trillion dollar “surcharge,” more than half of which will hit small businesses Page 336 — Section 551: “Imposes additional job-killing taxes, in the form of a half-trillion dollar ‘surcharge,’ more than half of which will hit small businesses;
The bill requires applicants to verify their citizenship, but not to verify identity Page 255 — Section 345: “Includes language requiring verification of income for individuals wishing to receive federal health care subsidies under the bill — while the bill includes a requirement for applicants to verify their citizenship, it does not include a similar requirement to verify applicants’ identity,

It’s certainly interesting to see that Rehberg managed to not only hit on all of the arguments advanced by Limbaugh, but he used the same language. I wonder if it’s possible that Limbaugh and Rehberg were using the same playbook, while Rehberg pretended to be evaluating the bill.

In what is perhaps the most astonishing twist, Limbaugh was more honest than Rehberg.  Consider the claim about a loss of 114 million people losing coverage. Rehberg leaves out that claim comes from the Lewin Group—and for good reason. The Lewin Group is a wholly-owned subsidiary of UnitedHealth Group, one of the largest private insurers in the country.

I’ll get back to the rest of the specious talking points that Rehberg is being fed later, but at a basic level, how can we trust Rehberg, who is presenting himself as some consumer champion, when all he is really doing is parroting talking points from insurance companies and the far right?

It’s an embarrassment, and it’s a damn shame that the media couldn’t search to find the source for the claims before promoting Rehberg’s “work.”

Article by

Don is from Shelby, MT (Go Coyotes!) and has lived in Montana his whole life. He teaches English and Debate in Helena, MT, and does most of his writing far too late at night.

{ 120 comments… read them below or add one }

Rusty Shackleford October 31, 2009 at 10:28 am

Safe to assume that you’ve actually read the entire piece of legislation, all 1,990 pages, right Pogie?

Reply

Pogie October 31, 2009 at 10:45 am

1) I’m not pretending to have done so, unlike a certain member of Congress or radio talk show host.

2) The portions I am discussing are clear misrepresentations of fact, logic, and even basic reading comprehension.

3) How many pieces of legislation do you believe Rehberg has read in his Congressional career? Why the sudden concern for the text?

Reply

Rusty Shackleford October 31, 2009 at 2:21 pm

I’m kind of curious as to how you came across a transcript for Rushbo’s show from yesterday and were able to make such an amazing connection so quickly…you wouldn’t be parroting someone else would you?

You did listen to Rush yesterday and came to these conclusions all on your own, correct?

Reply

Pogie October 31, 2009 at 2:32 pm

I have an amazing tool available for you to look at.

It’s called GOOGLE.

I read Rehberg’s comments, and immediately used THE GOOGLE.

Look into it.

Reply

Rusty Shackleford October 31, 2009 at 2:44 pm

Why did you cite NO source for you findings in your posting?

Reply

Pogie October 31, 2009 at 3:10 pm

Use the google.

Should I cite Limbaugh’s transcript? Or Rehberg’s facebook page?

The only thing that would have required a citation in an academic setting was the reference to the Lewin Group, which is a relatively well-known fact.

in case it helps, Sourcewatch provides that information.
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Lewin_Group

Now that we have your little red herring out of the way, care to address the appropriateness of a member of Congress parroting talking points from Rush Limbaugh and presenting them as his own opinions?

Reply

Rusty Shackleford October 31, 2009 at 4:17 pm

Thanks for the Lewin Group link? But that doesn’t answer my question… WHERE did YOU find the transcript?

What makes you so certain that they didn’t come to the same conclusions independently?

This really is one of your weaker attempts to discredit Denny. LOL

Reply

Pogie October 31, 2009 at 4:24 pm

Are you as dim as you pretend?

It’s the same language, for the love of the God–the exact same phrases. It’s the same list of complaints, down to the last detail.

In less than day, two people independently came up with the same concerns, using the same language in a 1900 word bill?

Come on. You’re embarrassing yourself here.

Reply

Duncan Idaho October 31, 2009 at 5:56 pm

Dude, I’m pretty sure the bar for Rusty to feel embarrassed at himself is a lot lower than that!

But seriously, Pogie, this is a pretty good analysis using The Google! I didn’t realize Denny was quite such a Dittohead! What a doofus. What an embarrassment to our state.

I don’t think I’ve read your blog before–I came here from LitW today. I’ll be back!

Reply

Ralph Hansen November 2, 2009 at 9:10 am

Did you ever consider that maybe the Republican Party was combining its resources to examine the more outrgeous provisions in Pelosi’s 1,990-page monstrosity? Pretty weak to suggest Denny is parroting Rush. More likely they’re both using the same source …

http://www.gop.gov/blog/09/10/29/fact-check-and-details-about

Reply

Rusty Shackleford November 2, 2009 at 3:51 pm

WHAT R U DOING?! THIS ISN’T ABOUT FACTS, THIS IS ABOUT DENNY & RUSH & THEIR SHENANIGANS OR SOMETHING!!1!

HOW DARE YOU INJECT FACTS INTO THIS DEBATE!!1! >=[

Reply

Pogie November 2, 2009 at 4:04 pm

Stick to South Park. It’s marginally less tiresome.

Reply

Pogie November 2, 2009 at 4:03 pm

I think you’re missing my point. I know and everyone else knows this is a coordinated smear campaign by the Republicans and the insurance industry.

What’s amusing is how Rehberg is presenting these “findings” as if they are the result of his personal work reading through the bill. That’s just sad.

Reply

Ralph Hansen November 2, 2009 at 9:17 am

Here’s another link with the exact items you’ve cited …

http://www.gop.gov/policy-news/09/10/29/reading-guide–pelosi

Are you surprised that Republicans are working together to expose the truth and show Americans just how bad this legislation is?

Reply

Duncan Idaho November 6, 2009 at 12:22 pm

Thanks for posting the links, Ralph. Guess we jumped to the conclusion that Denny is a capital-D Dittohead. But not about the lying part. Did you notice the very first item on that gop.gov list?

Page 94 – Section 202(c) prohibits the sale of private individual health insurance policies, beginning in 2013, forcing individuals to purchase coverage through the federal government

A grossly misleading read (as flagged by Pogie in his next post!)–much like the second item on the GOP list, regarding federal coverage of abortions.
So in answer to your question, no, I’m still not surprised by Republicans. However, if they ever do provide an honest argument to show flaws in the House legislation, I will be surprised. There are plenty of flaws, but so far they’re only being exposed by progressives, not by rightwingers.

Reply

Pogie November 2, 2009 at 4:04 pm

Truth? Really? Truth?

Like citing an insurance company front group as a non-partisan, non-biased observer? Like claiming the bill outlaws private insurance when it doesn’t?

Not too much truth there.

Reply

chanel handbags January 15, 2012 at 10:44 pm

Hey am i allowed to reference a portion of the content used in this entry basically make a link into your online site?

Reply

Cheap Beats By Dre January 16, 2012 at 3:35 am

Very good written post. It will be beneficial to everyone who employess it, including myself. Keep up the good work – for sure i will check out more posts.

Reply

ghd midnight January 16, 2012 at 7:00 am

I’m sure extremely thrilled to have been faced with the whole website page and to quite a lot of more cool times reading here. Thanks a lot again for the majority of things.

Reply

Natasha Funderburg January 16, 2012 at 12:29 pm

I’m confused :(

Reply

Miguelina Mcguinnes January 16, 2012 at 12:33 pm

Fabulous post! I was actually in need of information about canine training but came across this post and discovered it really interesting and very helpful. Keep up the wonderful work you are doing here.

Reply

gucci bags January 16, 2012 at 7:41 pm

Woh I enjoy your web site posts, saved to favorites ! .

Reply

louis vuitton online January 16, 2012 at 9:01 pm

Equally normal you will have presented several wonderful insight. Been a lurker on the webpage for long periods and should give through you for locating time to generate it.

Reply

nike shox turbo January 16, 2012 at 10:59 pm

Aw, this was a very nice post. In concept I wish to put in writing like this additionally – taking time and precise effort to make a very good article… however what can I say… I procrastinate alot and under no circumstances seem to get one thing done.

Reply

nike free run January 16, 2012 at 11:04 pm

I’d need to test with you here. Which isn’t something I often do! I enjoy reading a post that may make individuals think. Additionally, thanks for allowing me to comment!

Reply

martials arts/martial arts/arts martials January 17, 2012 at 2:04 am

If you need help computer security, enters pcsecurity

Reply

Cheap Monster - Beats By Dr Dre Studio New York Yankees Limited Edition On-Ear H January 17, 2012 at 6:35 am

Just desire to say your article is as surprising. The clearness in your post is just nice and i could assume you’re an expert on this subject. Well with your permission let me to grab your RSS feed to keep updated with forthcoming post. Thanks a million and please continue the gratifying work.

Reply

immobilier January 17, 2012 at 11:38 pm

Coucou les gens quel est votre avis de mon nouveau blog sur l’ immobilier ?

Reply

Cheap Monster - Beats By Dr Dre Studio Superman For Dwight Howard Special Edition January 18, 2012 at 2:36 am

Hello there, just became aware of your blog through Google, and found that it’s really informative. I am gonna watch out for brussels. I’ll appreciate if you continue this in future. Many people will be benefited from your writing. Cheers!

Reply

Nobuko Blackaby January 18, 2012 at 11:35 am

Great daytime, might be here’s towards situation merely well, i%u2019ve become executing study concerning your webpage which%u2019s why it can be obviously pro. I include been using a fresh unique writings with your lover with attempting return glance good, each time as well as feel a response i%u2019ve ruin it. Recommendations on how burdensome was considered the to ensure that you site? Properly any man much for example me lacking an occurence make this happen, on top that complete folks boost web should possess linked to chewing entirely up receiving that may done plus?

Reply

ghd midnight January 18, 2012 at 12:12 pm

Please message me by hints & suggestions about how we made your website look this awesome, We would have fun here!

Reply

ghd stockists geelong January 18, 2012 at 2:45 pm

An impressive share, I simply given this onto a colleague who was doing a little evaluation on this. And he in truth purchased me breakfast as a result of I discovered it for him.. smile. So let me reword that: Thnx for the treat! However yeah Thnkx for spending the time to debate this, I feel strongly about it and love studying more on this topic. If potential, as you change into expertise, would you thoughts updating your blog with extra particulars? It is highly useful for me. Huge thumb up for this weblog post!

Reply

timberland mukluk January 18, 2012 at 5:58 pm

There are a few interesting ideas in time in this post however I don’t understand if I notice all of them core to heart. There’s a few validity but I’m going to bring hold point of view unless I check into it all further. Great text , thanks and we want more! Added to FeedBurner as well

Reply

louis vuitton us January 19, 2012 at 2:27 am

I have to admit which the is a fantastic post..Really now i’m impressed as a result post….the individual who create this post it was actually a very good human. I put the link with your blog at my site, i do hope you don’t mind?

Reply

immobilier January 19, 2012 at 6:19 am

Coucou les amis que pensez-vous de mon nouveau site sur l’ immobilier ?

Reply

repossessed cars January 19, 2012 at 8:10 am

Hi there! Do you know if they make any plugins to assist with Search Engine Optimization? I’m trying to get my blog to rank for some targeted keywords but I’m not seeing very good gains. If you know of any please share. Thanks!

Reply

Titan January 19, 2012 at 10:48 am

Hiya! I just wish to give a huge thumbs up for the good information you’ve here on this post. I can be coming back to your blog for extra soon.

Reply

nike high heels australia January 20, 2012 at 8:28 am

This is the perfect blog for any person who wants to find out about this kind of question. You know so much its almost difficult to argue with you (not that I actually would want…HaHa). You certainly put a different spin on the topic thats really been discussed consistently. Awesome stuff, just simply great!

Reply

Monster - Beats by Dr Dre Studio - Philadelphia Eagles Limited Edition Headphones January 20, 2012 at 12:07 pm

Awsome post and straight to the point. I don’t know if this is in fact the best place to ask but do you folks have any ideea where to employ some professional writers? Thanks :)

Reply

canada goose paris January 20, 2012 at 12:25 pm

I found your blog web site on google and verify a couple of of your early posts. Proceed to maintain up the excellent operate. I just extra up your RSS feed to my MSN Information Reader. Seeking ahead to studying more from you later on!…

Reply

hermes bracelet January 21, 2012 at 12:00 am

Hey пїЅC nice blog, wanting around some blogs, seems quite a nice platform you’re using.

Reply

Jerri Mau January 21, 2012 at 7:34 am

My partner and I stumbled over here different page and thought I should check things out. I like what I see so i am just following you. Look forward to looking over your web page for a second time.

Reply

ghd specials south africa January 22, 2012 at 5:11 am

WONDERFUL Post.thanks for share..more wait .. …

Reply

8x12 shed plans free January 22, 2012 at 1:36 pm

I delight in that which you guys are up way too. This kind of clever do the job and reporting! Retain up the awesome functions men I’ve added you guys to blogroll.

Reply

immobilier January 22, 2012 at 2:50 pm

Bonsoir chers lecteurs quel est votre point de vue de mon nouveau site sur l’ immobilier ?

Reply

cheap violin January 22, 2012 at 10:44 pm

So significantly info on one page, kudo to you it should have taken you a long time to write this!

Reply

beats by dr dre in south Africa January 23, 2012 at 6:36 am

you’ve a terrific blog here! would you prefer to make some invite posts on my blog?

Reply

nike heels January 23, 2012 at 6:36 am

Spot on with this write-up, I really assume this web site needs way more consideration. I’ll probably be again to learn rather more, thanks for that info.

Reply

nike dunk high heels Australia January 23, 2012 at 6:36 am

Nice post. I learn something more challenging on different blogs everyday. It will always be stimulating to read content from other writers and practice a little something from their store. I’d prefer to use some with the content on my blog whether you don’t mind. Natually I’ll give you a link on your web blog. Thanks for sharing.

Reply

immobilier January 25, 2012 at 12:45 am

Salut les gens que pensez-vous de mon nouveau site sur l’ immobilier ?

Reply

angielski January 25, 2012 at 1:44 am

“You really know your stuff… Keep up the good work!”

Reply

Terrance Duffus January 25, 2012 at 6:50 pm

Can I just say such a relief to locate someone that actually knows what theyre referring to on the net. You definitely understand how to bring a problem to light and make it important. More and more people need to check this out and appreciate this side in the story. I cant believe you are not widely used when you definitely possess the gift.

Reply

Marcia Statum January 26, 2012 at 12:15 am

Only wanna input on few general things, The website pattern is perfect, the articles is very wonderful : D.

Reply

JustBeats Headphones January 28, 2012 at 1:58 am

The Zune concentrates on being a Portable Media Player. Not a web browser. Not a game machine. Maybe in the future it’ll do even better in those areas, but for now it’s a fantastic way to organize and listen to your music and videos, and is without peer in that regard. The iPod’s strengths are its web browsing and apps. If those sound more compelling, perhaps it is your best choice.

Reply

KAtalog Stron January 28, 2012 at 8:08 am

It’s good page, I was looking for something like this

Reply

Hospital Panel January 29, 2012 at 3:13 am

Pretty section of content. I simply stumbled upon your weblog and in accession capital to claim that I acquire in fact loved account your blog posts. Anyway I¡¦ll be subscribing in your feeds and even I fulfillment you get right of entry to constantly quickly.

Reply

blood glucose meter January 29, 2012 at 11:32 pm

I genuinely prize your work , Great post.

Reply

immobilier January 30, 2012 at 12:18 am

Bonsoir tout le monde comment trouvez-vous de mon nouveau blog sur l’ immobilier ?

Reply

Leave a Comment

{ 1 trackback }

Previous post:

Next post: