December 2011

I’ll admit that typically when I write about Montana’s sole representative in the House it’s to criticize him for not really doing anything. This year, however, no doubt inspired by his desire to moveDenny Rehberg - Caricature up an office, Rehberg has been a dynamo of activity. Unfortunately, most of it has been bad for Montana and the nation.

Back home, he’s made such poor business decisions that his net worth somehow dropped by over 50%, he’s claimed to struggle with the burden of being cash poor,  he’s pursued a failed lawsuit against the City of Billings and its firefighters, and he’s managed to get Montana’s media to ignore many of his terrible decisions in Washington.

Honestly, guys, you need to do better. When Rehberg makes national news, you need to cover it.

While I’m sure I’ve missed more than a few Rehberg actions this year, these are simply 25 Things Montana Voters Should Know About Dennis Rehberg:

  1. He voted to gut Social Security and Medicare.
  2. He co-sponsored a massive federal land grab, one which endangers hunting and fishing rights as well as private property rights. His justification for the 100 mile corridor on Montana’s border with Canada? A 2006 meeting in Hamilton, MT.
  3. He announced that Pell Grants (which help poor and middle class students attend college) were becoming the “welfare of the 21st century.”
  4. He wrote language which would have decreased the safety of our nation’s drug supply, increased dangers in the blood supply, increased lead in children’s toys, and reduced the FDA’s ability to regulate tobacco consumption. The language was so bad that the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network, American Heart Association and American Lung Association all attacked Rehberg’s bill.
  5. He voted against the payroll tax deduction for Montana workers, a measure that included his own amendment to speed the process for deciding the fate of the Keystone XL project.
  6. He wrote a secretive appropriations bill so lacking in transparency that even members of the committee were surprised by its content. It gutted national service programs, defunded vital reproductive health services, and aid for college students.
  7. He voted against FEMA disaster relief funds just as Montana farmers and communities were facing devastating flooding across the Eastern part of the state.
  8. He voted to undermine the Clean Water Act while the Yellowstone River was filling with oil from a ruptured pipeline.
  9. He wrote language to restrict federal spending on tobacco prevention.
  10. He’s claimed that public land belongs to him, restricting access to hunters.
  11. He worked against Senator Tester’s Forest Jobs and Recreation Bill, not for any policy reasons, but to advance his own political agenda. Rehbergs still has not proposed his own legislation on the matter.
  12. He pushed a provision which will double the amount of coal particulate in the environment.
  13. He has refused to work on a bipartisan solution to the Post Office mess, despite having been a part of the Republican Congress which created a big part of the problem.
  14. He wrote language to cut Americorps, a cost effective program to improve communities and get more kids to college.
  15. He took credit for opposing a tax on contractors—a tax he helped create and voted for five years ago.
  16. Concerned about wasteful spending, he didn’t go after defense contractors who’ve made obscene profits in Iraq and Afghanistan, but hungry schoolchildren.
  17. He attacked a National Institutes of Health initiative designed to get drug treatments more quickly to those suffering from diseases.
  18. He took thousands from the tobacco industry before writing legislation restricting the FDA’s ability to control the product.
  19. He sponsored a bill which dramatically reduced a woman’s right to control her health and reproductive choice.
  20. He voted to allow government contractors to keep their political donations secret.
  21. He voted against helping the people of Libby who have suffered for decades from asbestos-related illnesses.
  22. He wrote an ill-conceived amendment which would have ended Medicare Advantage.
  23. He used parliamentary procedure to block extending unemployment benefits for Montana workers.
  24. He used such inflammatory rhetoric at the Montana Legislature, threatening Judge Donald Malloy, that he received national media attention.
  25. He changed his mind on the Patriot Act again and then again.

While I’m certainly surprised that no posts directly critical of Representative Rehberg cracked the top five this year, I’m quite certain he won the aggregate total. Better luck next year, Mr. Rehberg—once you lose one contest in November, you’ll need the consolation.

Thanks to everyone who’s continued to read and discuss, even (especially) when we disagree—and a Happy 2012 to you all.

5. Why Public Schools are ‘Failing’, Pt. 1

From contributor The Polish Wolf, this short post about schools led to a heated discussion about the role of unions and poverty in schools.

4. Watch Out, GOP Gubernatorial Candidates. Neil Livingstone Might Just “Disappear” You

I certainly have to say that Mr. Livingstone has proven to be the most entertaining GOP candidate for office in Montana since Mr. Kelleher from Butte. When he’s not trying to profit from the civil war in Libya, he’s demonstrating a complete lack of knowledge about Montana.

3. A Sellout’s Manifesto Or How I Learned To Stop Worrying and Love the Party

“Does the Democratic Party move too slowly and too cautiously in the defense of progressive values? Does it even occasionally move against those goals? Certainly—and it’s frustrating when they do it. Should progressives fight tooth and nail to drive the party back to its roots of protecting the worker, the Constitution, and a sense of economic justice? Absolutely.

But that progressives are seriously discussing working against, or even voting against Democrats, at a time when basic economic rights and the future of the country are at stake, absolutely baffles me.

Ideological purity feels wonderful, but it won’t feed a child who needs better nutrition to learn.”

2. The Terrifically Stupid Twenty: More GOP Job Creation and The “This Has to Be Satire” Thirty: More Bad Bills from the Legislature

Lest anyone forget just how inept the Montana GOP proved itself to be during the past legislative session, these two posts offer a primer into the thinking of modern Montana Republicans. From trying to take away the rights of Montanans to fish in their streams to attempting to mandate counseling for divorce, your Republican legislators made a mockery of good governance and common sense.

1. How Eager Are Progressives to Elect Senator Rehberg?

Certainly my most controversial post of the year—and one I still stand by. The 2012 Montana Senate election is going to be one of, if not the most contested race in the nation—and could well determine the balance of power in the Senate. While Senator Tester has certainly disappointed in some areas, he is clearly a stronger voice for progressive values than his opponent, a man who believes that student loans are welfare, that black lung disease and air pollution are fine, and that lead in our children’s toys and toxins in our blood supply are all fine.

Before progressives write off Senator Tester, I urge to at least look at this list of votes he’s cast—and think about the positions his rival would take. For me, an imperfect candidate who is pro-labor, pro-choice, pro-environment, and pro-Montana  is a candidate an imperfect voter is proud to support.

Post Office Used Bad Data To Determine Closures

by Don Pogreba on December 29, 2011 · 55 comments

in US Politics

The Washington Post reports that the Post Office used bad data, including inaccurate information about profitability and distance when it decided which offices to shutter:
The U.S. Postal Service relied on questionable data to identify more than 3,600 post offices and other retail operations to study for closure, an oversight panel has concluded.

In many cases the selection process ignored whether an alternate post office was nearby and which closures would reduce costs the most and lacked sufficient data and analysis to make the best decisions, the Postal Regulatory Commission said.

While Congressional meddling is responsible for a large share of the current troubles the Post Office faces (thanks, Representative Rehberg!) Congress should pay attention to this report and put more pressure on the Post Office to make good choices about the branches to close and convert into “village” post offices.

The Post Office simply needs to do better than this:

But the oversight commission consulted economists and other experts who concluded that other factors should come into play: How many miles away is the nearest post office? Would closing deny service to large groups of customers, such as seniors, who would have trouble finding alternatives?

The Postal Service also has a poor idea of how much money the closures will save, the commission said. Postal officials combine revenue from retail sales with day-to-day costs of operation. Balance sheets for several stations and branches are lumped together, making it hard to know which facility loses the most money.

“So when you’re deciding, I want to close this station as opposed to that one, it’s not clear which should go, except for the gut feeling of the postmaster,” Goldway said.

Eric Lipton, writing in the New York Times, describes a uniqueDenny Rehberg - Caricature cause for a budget-conscious member of the House, selling himself out to the mining industry so indiscriminately that he’s willing to risk the health and safety of workers and cost the federal government billions of dollars in disability payments.

Unsurprisingly, that members of the House is Montana’s Dennis Rehberg, who

… pushed through a provision for 2012 federal budget that blocks the enforcement of a new regulation that would have cut in half the amount of ambient coal dust permitted in mines. Inhalation of the tiny coal particles is blamed for pneumoconiosis, or black lung, a preventable disease that has taken thousands of lives and cost the federal government an estimated $44 billion in federal disability payments since the 1970s.

Lipton’s piece is loaded with documentation about Rehberg’s obeisance to the mining industry. He’s also pushed for land swaps which would benefit mining companies at the expense of taxpayers, lobbied against safety regulations that protect miners, and fought to open copper mining in pristine Montana wilderness.

The mining companies have rewarded Rehberg, with the 7th most donations of all House and Senate members.

The industry has shown its gratitude for his vigilance. “He has been incredibly valuable to us,” said Bud Clinch, executive director of the Montana Coal Council.

Just in the past two years, mining industry executives and companies including big players like Murray Energy, Arch Coal and Cloud Peak Energy have donated nearly $100,000 to Mr. Rehberg’s Senate campaign.

Rehberg doesn’t even want to ensure that mining companies clean up the messes they leave on our land.

It’s just another case of Representative Rehberg putting the interest of corporations ahead of workers, and multinationals ahead of Montanans.

And the influence game doesn’t end with direct contributions to the Congressman. The Rehberg family is in on the act. Rehberg’s son, A.J., who embodies the American meritocracy as well as Luke Russert, has repeatedly lobbied his father’s office in the past year, on behalf of mining interests:

A.J. Rehberg is also an executive at a lobbying firm that is representing Mongolia Forward and the Mongolian government in Washington. That lobbying firm, on behalf of the Mongolian government, has contacted Representative Rehberg’s office repeatedly this year, as well as other members of Congress. Representative Rehberg said in an interview that his son had not personally lobbied him, and that as far as he knew, his office had not taken any steps to help his son’s clients.

Maybe a New York Times story, a Freedom of Information Act request, and just some common sense will lead the Montana media to dig into Representative Rehberg’s sweet deal at the expense of Montana’s workers and lands.

Corey Stapleton goes after Schweitzer

by M. Storin on December 21, 2011 · 160 comments

in Montana Politics

Corey Stapleton (he’s running for Governor, just in case you’ve forgotten) has launched a Facebook ad campaign targeting Governor Schweitzer. It’s been running for a couple of days now. You can see a screen shot of the attack ad above.

I find it interesting, if not peculiar, that Stapleton is going after Schweitzer for wanting to develop coal in Montana.  According to recent polling, that might not be the best messaging strategy.

Rehberg Votes Against Montana Families, For Increased Taxes

December 20, 2011

Today, Representative Rehberg put his commitment to the TEA Party ahead of the interests of workers and their families, voting against a common sense compromise to continue payroll tax deductions for Montana workers. This was no radical proposal he rejected. The Senate voted 89-10 to support the measure. House Speaker Boehner (hardly a progressive thinker) [...]

Read the full article →

My Father: A Rememberance

December 20, 2011

December 20 will always be one of those uncomfortable anniversaries for me: it’s the anniversary of the day that my father passed away. No matter how many years have passed, I’ll always wish that I could talk to my Dad just one more time today, but even with his absence, every year is an opportunity to [...]

Read the full article →

Representative Rehberg Goes To Bat for Big Tobacco Again

December 19, 2011

Just when you think Representative Rehberg can’t make a worse decision as a member of Congress, he leaps to the challenge. Of late, it seems that his poor judgment extends to protecting the tobacco industry. The latest? Writing language which would prohibit federal expenditures on anti-tobacco campaigns: Congress also put the kibosh the use of [...]

Read the full article →