<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Intelligent Discontent &#187; Environment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://intelligentdiscontent.com/category/environment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://intelligentdiscontent.com</link>
	<description>Serving Up Snark Since 2005</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 05:45:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Save the Bats!</title>
		<link>http://intelligentdiscontent.com/2008/08/26/save-the-bats/</link>
		<comments>http://intelligentdiscontent.com/2008/08/26/save-the-bats/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 14:22:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Liz</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Energy Policy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intelligentdiscontent.com/?p=1522</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was reading this morning  about wind farms&#8230; and how they are lethal for bats. I am just wondering though - out of all the options we have, which is the lesser evil: coal and oil or air, water, and solar power?  As I was reading about the cons of wind farms, I did get a little [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7581990.stm" target="_blank">reading this morning</a>  about wind farms&#8230; and how they are lethal for bats. I am just wondering though - out of all the options we have, which is the lesser evil: coal and oil or air, water, and solar power?  As I was reading about the cons of wind farms, I did get a little disheartened. Apparently, when the huge arms of the wind turbines rotate they change the atmospheric pressure in front of them. Birds are not affected by this pressure change, but bats are. When bats fly near them, the don&#8217;t get hit, they just die from internal hemorrhaging (um, ouch). But let&#8217;s think about it - there are plenty of ways to deter bats from wind farms.  Bats rely on an echo navigating system, and some research groups have supported a radar system that would act as a bat scare. Granted, it&#8217;s not natural (nothing really is), but in my humble opinion, it&#8217;s a lot better than burning ancient mulch and dead dinosaurs. We can save the bats!   No matter who wins the election this November [<a href="http://my.barackobama.com/page/content/newenergy" target="_blank">Obama, please</a>], both are campaigning for more <a href="http://www.johnmccain.com//Informing/Issues/17671aa4-2fe8-4008-859f-0ef1468e96f4.htm#3" target="_blank">green energy</a> .  With science and time, perhaps he can earn the name Batman for his efforts to save our furry little blind friends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://intelligentdiscontent.com/2008/08/26/save-the-bats/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Your Republican Scientists in the Montana Legislature</title>
		<link>http://intelligentdiscontent.com/2008/08/23/your-republican-scientists-in-the-montana-legislature/</link>
		<comments>http://intelligentdiscontent.com/2008/08/23/your-republican-scientists-in-the-montana-legislature/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 11:18:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pogie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[MT Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intelligentdiscontent.com/2008/08/23/your-republican-scientists-in-the-montana-legislature/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It’s hard to argue with reasoning like this. Confronted by environmental groups who say that the legislative Environmental Quality Council’s draft recommendations don’t do enough to address greenhouse gas emissions, Representative Chas Vincent of Libby had this to say:
“I believe the science is not resolved,” Vincent said. “And there’s a growing body of evidence that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s hard to argue with reasoning like this. Confronted by environmental groups who say that the legislative Environmental Quality Council’s draft recommendations don’t do enough to address greenhouse gas emissions, Representative Chas Vincent of Libby had this to say:</p>
<blockquote><p>“I believe the science is not resolved,” Vincent said. “And there’s a growing body of evidence that shows there are many things that factor into climate change. Do I agree that there is climate change happening? Yes. Do I believe man is the indicator? No.”</p>
</blockquote>
<p>It might be a starting point for Representative Vincent to learn what an “indicator” is. I’d also be fascinating to learn what scientific research he’d consulted. I suspect it was on the AM dial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://intelligentdiscontent.com/2008/08/23/your-republican-scientists-in-the-montana-legislature/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Keeping Montana Montana</title>
		<link>http://intelligentdiscontent.com/2008/07/01/keeping-montana-montana/</link>
		<comments>http://intelligentdiscontent.com/2008/07/01/keeping-montana-montana/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 19:16:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob Funk</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Max Baucus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intelligentdiscontent.com/?p=1412</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I applaud the fact that
A huge patchwork of privately owned forest in northwest Montana — much of it abutting wilderness, and together almost a third the size of Rhode Island — will be permanently protected from development under an agreement announced Monday by two private conservation groups, the Nature Conservancy and the Trust for Public [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I applaud <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/01/us/01develop.html?_r=1&amp;ref=us&amp;oref=slogin">the fact</a> that</p>
<blockquote><p>A huge patchwork of privately owned forest in northwest Montana — much of it abutting wilderness, and together almost a third the size of Rhode Island — will be permanently protected from development under an agreement announced Monday by two private conservation groups, the Nature Conservancy and the Trust for Public Land.</p>
<p>The groups will pay $510 million for about 500 square miles of forest now owned by Plum Creek Timber, a lumber and real estate firm based in Seattle. It is one of the biggest sales of forest land for preservation purposes in United States history, conservation experts said.</p></blockquote>
<p>And  Baucus deserves credit for  setting up the federal bond that allowed for this to go through. We, as Montanans, need to prioritize conserving Montanan&#8217;s beauty - it&#8217;s what makes Montana Montana.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2008/07/01/us/01develop.map.gif" alt="" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://intelligentdiscontent.com/2008/07/01/keeping-montana-montana/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Those new-fangled light bulbs?  Red Chinese plot!</title>
		<link>http://intelligentdiscontent.com/2008/06/15/those-new-fangled-light-bulbs-red-chinese-plot/</link>
		<comments>http://intelligentdiscontent.com/2008/06/15/those-new-fangled-light-bulbs-red-chinese-plot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 17:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Policy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Those Wacky Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intelligentdiscontent.com/2008/06/15/those-new-fangled-light-bulbs-red-chinese-plot/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are a number of problems with Congressperson Poe&#8217;s arguments here but it is worth the five minutes&#8230;

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are a number of problems with Congressperson Poe&#8217;s arguments here but it is worth the five minutes&#8230;</p>
<div class="youtube-video"><object height="344" width="425"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/e-LOtKIIKcg&amp;hl=en"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/e-LOtKIIKcg&amp;hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" height="344" width="425"></embed></object></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://intelligentdiscontent.com/2008/06/15/those-new-fangled-light-bulbs-red-chinese-plot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Joe Balyeat Writes About Consensus; Earth Flattens.</title>
		<link>http://intelligentdiscontent.com/2008/05/21/joe-balyeat-writes-about-consensus-earth-flattens/</link>
		<comments>http://intelligentdiscontent.com/2008/05/21/joe-balyeat-writes-about-consensus-earth-flattens/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 08:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pogie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[MT Politics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Those Wacky Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intelligentdiscontent.com/2008/05/21/joe-balyeat-writes-about-consensus-earth-flattens/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The very independent right wing Montana blogs are all aflutter today about Joe Balyeat&#8217;s latest foray into a subject he knows little about. This time it&#8217;s two subjects: global warming and compromise.
Balyeat, writing in the Montana Standard, wants us to believe that he believes deeply in compromise on the subject of energy independence and global [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The very independent right wing Montana blogs <a href="http://electriccityweblog.com/?p=552">are</a> <a href="http://www.bigskycairn.com/2008/05/19/sen-joe-balyeat-gets-the-climate-change-debate/">all</a> aflutter today about Joe Balyeat&#8217;s <a href="http://www.montanastandard.com/articles/2008/05/16/opinion/hjjbjeiehghchi.txt">latest foray</a> into a subject he knows little about. This time it&#8217;s two subjects: global warming and compromise.</p>
<p>Balyeat, writing in the Montana Standard, wants us to believe that he believes deeply in compromise on the subject of energy independence and global warming. The problem, according to Balyeat, is not over-reliance on fossil fuels or our unwillingness to control our consumption of energy, but a lack of politeness on behalf of those who want to work on reduction of fossil fuel usage. </p>
<p>Despite his claim of searching for common ground, Balyeat&nbsp; is hardly fair when describing defenders of the scientific consensus about global warming. In the course of his 600 words, he seems to be calling for more polite dialogue from people he describes as &#8220;condescending&#8221; advocates of &#8220;intrusive government,&#8221; drinkers of &#8216;global warming Koolaid&#8221; and &#8220;secular doomsayers&#8221; who rely&nbsp; &#8220;demeaning insults&#8221; and &#8220;scare stories&#8221; to make their arguments. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s certainly hard to understand why Senator Balyeat is having such a hard time working with these people.</p>
<p> It&#8217;s a classic display of the kind of logic that dominates right wing thinking on science, whether it&#8217;s global warming or evolution. Because they cannot imagine that human fossil fuel use is accelerating warming to dangerous levels or that life on Earth evolved over billions of years, it can&#8217;t be true. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s not compromise if one side refuses to acknowledge scientific evidence. It&#8217;s absurd. If consensus will move the Montana and federal governments forward on global warming, I&#8217;m all for it, but to believe that consensus is coming from an unscientific, insulting position like this, Montanans concerned about the environment would really need to be as stupid as Joe Balyeat thinks we are.</p>
<p><strong>Footnote: </strong>At the end of his piece, Balyeat claims to be a three time National Merit Scholar. Given that high school students can only be selected as National Merit Scholars once, I think Mr. Balyeat might just be making something else up as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://intelligentdiscontent.com/2008/05/21/joe-balyeat-writes-about-consensus-earth-flattens/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Idaho Anti Wolf Coalition Falls Short</title>
		<link>http://intelligentdiscontent.com/2008/05/06/idaho-anti-wolf-coalition-calls-short/</link>
		<comments>http://intelligentdiscontent.com/2008/05/06/idaho-anti-wolf-coalition-calls-short/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 00:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob Funk</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[In the Region]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intelligentdiscontent.com/?p=1311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Idaho Anti Wolf Coalition has fallen short, thank god. The coalition had been trying to collect 45,000 signatures by May 1st in order to put a wolf removal initiative on Idaho&#8217;s ballot, which called for the complete removal of wolves from Idaho. The Anti Wolf Coalition only managed to get about 35,000 signatures. 
The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Idaho Anti Wolf Coalition has <a href="http://www.greatfallstribune.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080506/NEWS01/80506011/1002">fallen short</a>, thank god. The coalition had been trying to collect 45,000 signatures by May 1st in order to put a <span class="bodytext">wolf removal initiative on Idaho&#8217;s ballot, which called for the <em>complete </em>removal of wolves from Idaho. The Anti Wolf Coalition only managed to get about 35,000 signatures. </span></p>
<p>The Idaho Anti Wolf Coalition <span class="bodytext">is a group believes that wolves are harming deer and elk populations, despite scientific evidence to the contrary. Why? Because they&#8217;re &#8220;</span><a href="http://wolves.wordpress.com/2008/04/13/idaho-anti-wolf-coalition-fundraiser-cascade-idaho/">sick of hearing about biology and science!</a>&#8221;</p>
<p>The scary thing is this: how did they even get 35,000 signatures? It&#8217;s bad enough that <span class="bodytext">federal Endangered Species protections have been removed, but wipe them all out? Is this <a href="http://www.fws.gov/laws/lawsdigest/andamag.html">1931</a>?<br />
</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://intelligentdiscontent.com/2008/05/06/idaho-anti-wolf-coalition-calls-short/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Save the Whales! (from Cheney)</title>
		<link>http://intelligentdiscontent.com/2008/05/01/save-the-whales-from-cheney/</link>
		<comments>http://intelligentdiscontent.com/2008/05/01/save-the-whales-from-cheney/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 19:52:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob Funk</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Cheney]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Those Wacky Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intelligentdiscontent.com/?p=1306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[During this hectic election season, we sometimes forget about the miserable administration we currently have. Well, Dick Cheney seems to miss the attention he once received for being a leading contender for &#8220;biggest SOB&#8221; in the world, because he&#8217;s going to new lengths to prove his cold, shriveled-up heart still beats.
Cheney has his office working [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During this hectic election season, we sometimes forget about the miserable administration we currently have. Well, Dick Cheney seems to miss the attention he once received for being a leading contender for &#8220;biggest SOB&#8221; in the world, because he&#8217;s going to new lengths to prove his cold, shriveled-up heart still beats.</p>
<p>Cheney has his office <a href="http://blogs.tnr.com/tnr/blogs/environmentandenergy/archive/2008/04/30/cheney-goes-whaling.aspx">working overtime</a> to delay<strong> </strong>NOAA regulations that call for lower ship speeds near ports - a measure that is scientifically proven to lower whale deaths and injuries.</p>
<p>Is this guy serious? It&#8217;s ALMOST laughable how cartoonish his evil has become, almost. If only Clinton and Obama could combine their forces, because, at this point, we might need Captain Planet to save us from the Cheney-Bush gang.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://intelligentdiscontent.com/2008/05/01/save-the-whales-from-cheney/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Forest Restoration and the Grizzlies</title>
		<link>http://intelligentdiscontent.com/2007/11/24/forest-restoration-and-the-grizzlies/</link>
		<comments>http://intelligentdiscontent.com/2007/11/24/forest-restoration-and-the-grizzlies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 19:59:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pogie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intelligentdiscontent.com/2007/11/24/forest-restoration-and-the-grizzlies/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Watching the Grizzlies game (where my fears about their ability to stop the option are being played out), I had the opportunity to watch a delightful ad from the Montana Wood Products Association. It turns out that they want to &#8220;restore&#8221; Montana&#8217;s forests to combat global warming.  Who knew?  
Go, Griz.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Watching the Grizzlies game (where my fears about their ability to stop the option are being played out), I had the opportunity to watch a delightful ad from the Montana Wood Products Association. It turns out that they want to &#8220;restore&#8221; Montana&#8217;s forests to combat global warming.  Who knew? <img src='http://intelligentdiscontent.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Go, Griz.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://intelligentdiscontent.com/2007/11/24/forest-restoration-and-the-grizzlies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Helena&#8217;s Deer: Safe to Live Another Day</title>
		<link>http://intelligentdiscontent.com/2007/09/27/helenas-deer-safe-to-live-another-day/</link>
		<comments>http://intelligentdiscontent.com/2007/09/27/helenas-deer-safe-to-live-another-day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 05:43:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pogie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Helena]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://intelligentdiscontent.com/2007/09/27/helenas-deer-safe-to-live-another-day/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The debate about Helena&#8217;s deer problem is sure to continue, following today&#8217;s vote by the state&#8217;s Fish, Wildlife and Parks department to not allow the city of Helena to begin using sharpshooters to cull the local deer population.
Personally, I applaud the decision. Despite a few well-publicized incidents, I find it hard to believe that aggressive [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The debate about Helena&#8217;s deer problem is sure to continue, <a href="http://www.helenair.com/articles/2007/09/27/helena_top/deer2.txt">following today&#8217;s vote</a> by the state&#8217;s Fish, Wildlife and Parks department to not allow the city of Helena to begin using sharpshooters to cull the local deer population.</p>
<p>Personally, I applaud the decision. Despite a few well-publicized incidents, I find it hard to believe that aggressive deer are all that problematic. I suspect that many more people visit hospitals and animals visit veterinarians as a result of interaction with dogs than the deer. </p>
<p>Commissioner Victor Workman made a lot of sense:</p>
<blockquote><p> &#8220;I see a people problem rather than problem deer,&#8221; Commissioner Victor Workman said. &#8220;Outside of an aggressive deer &#8230; I think we ought to leave the darn things alone.&#8221;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://intelligentdiscontent.com/2007/09/27/helenas-deer-safe-to-live-another-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Let &#8216;Em Burn!: John Sinrud on Wildfires</title>
		<link>http://intelligentdiscontent.com/2007/08/31/let-em-burn-john-sinrud-on-wildfires/</link>
		<comments>http://intelligentdiscontent.com/2007/08/31/let-em-burn-john-sinrud-on-wildfires/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pogie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[MT Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
A reader sends in this link starring Representative Sinrud (R-Bozeman) and featuring his comments about the need to fight fires.


{youtube}9VNPpHGwc24{/youtube}&#160;


Is it too late for the Republicans to consider a Burns-Sinrud ticket for the governor&#39;s race?&#160;


]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
A reader sends in this link starring Representative Sinrud (R-Bozeman) and featuring his comments about the need to fight fires.
</p>
<p>
{youtube}9VNPpHGwc24{/youtube}&nbsp;
</p>
<p>
Is it too late for the Republicans to consider a Burns-Sinrud ticket for the governor&#39;s race?&nbsp;
</p>
<p><span id="more-949"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://intelligentdiscontent.com/2007/08/31/let-em-burn-john-sinrud-on-wildfires/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
