Independent Record

I have to admit that I had little hope for the discussion section on today’s story in the Independent Record about the proposed anti-discrimination ordinance—and as is usually the case, the troglodytes raced right off to demonstrate just how hate-filled their cowardly, anonymous hearts can be.

Tiger Woops offered a slur and what seems to be a vague reference to Matthew Shepard in his comment:

tigerwoops

Michael S demonstrated his keen sense of tolerance and a disturbing predilection for bestiality:

michales

Steeline suggested that

steeline

These comments are precisely illustrative of why Helena needs an ordinance like the one Commissioner Haque-Hausrath and the Montana Human Rights Network are proposing. Despite real progress

And it usually comes from cowards who hide their hate behind masks or online pseudonyms.

A couple of quick notes about the Independent Record, on this issue, too. Given that their comments are moderated, should any of these comments have been allowed on the site? The IR policy states:

Name-calling, crude language and personal abuse are not welcome. Moderators will monitor comments with an eye toward maintaining a high level of civility in this forum.

I’d say hate speech falls somewhat short of a high level of civility.

With ballots beginning to roll out this week and a peculiar endorsement coming from the Independentcommission Record this past Sunday, it’s time to discuss the election for Helena City Commission. While I respect both of the new candidates willing to invest the energy necessary for running a city-wide campaign, an honest assessment of the candidates makes it clear that Helena should retain Matt Elsaesser and elect Katherine Haque-Hausrath.

(Given Elsaessaer’s status as an incumbent, I’m going to focus on the choice between Katherine Haque-Hausrath and Lora Behlmer in this post.)

Experience

Haque-Hausrath brings more experience to the table. Her experience as an attorney (one admired by her co-workers for her intelligence and hard work) will be invaluable to the commission as they tackle complex questions about Helena’s future.

Policy Proposals

She’s also got substantive policy proposals for the community. Her issues page on her web site demonstrates that she understands the needs of our evolving community when it comes to growth, the environment, and health.

I’m especially impressed that Haque-Hausrath is willing to push for an overdue anti-discrimination ordinance to ensure that all Helenans are treated equally under the law.

In contrast, Ms. Behlmer simply hasn’t offered any specifics in her campaign—not on her web site and not in the media. I take her at her word that she wants to listen to the people of Helena, but I don’t have any idea what agenda she would promote as a commissioner—and neither did the IR, which didn’t ask her to address a single policy issue in their endorsement.

Civic Engagement

Finally, and perhaps most importantly, Haque-Hausrath has earned our support because she has demonstrated a willingness to engage in the community. She’s campaigned tirelessly in the past few months, going door-to-door to meet with voters, place signs, and yes, raise money. That a first-time candidate has raised over $6,000 from almost 130 donors demonstrates her commitment and energy.

That’s real engagement—and from someone with a six-month old son.

In contrast, the IR offered this curious justification for its endorsement of Ms. Behlmer, along with their excitement about online polls:

It’s here that we drew another distinction between Haque-Hausrath and Behlmer; the latter struck us as more aggressive and ambitious in seeking input from all corners of the city, and not just those willing to attend the meetings.

All the evidence from this campaign proves the opposite. Ms. Behlmer has only raised just over $530 from fewer than ten donors, has done little door-to-door campaigning, and hasn’t articulated a plan to increase public involvement.

Ms. Behlmer may believe in increased civic engagement, but Haque-Hausrath has actually done it during this campaign.

Bottom Line

None of what I’ve written above is intended to slight Lora Behlmer. I commend her willingness to enter public life and run for office. I absolutely respect that, but Haque-Hausrath is the better choice for Helena.

Unfortunately, what seems quite clear in all of this is that, once again, the Independent Record is using its platform to push a conservative social agenda rather than the interests of the community. Consider this line about Haque-Hausrath from the news story about the three candidates:

She says she’s seen support from environmentalists in Helena as well as the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender community.

I think that’s tremendous. Helena needs another leader to stand up for the rights of all members of our community, regardless of their sexual identity and beliefs about the environment.

A responsible piece of journalism, though, would have noted that Haque-Hausrath has received a wide range of support from all parts of our community, from the mayor, current and former commissioners, both Democratic candidates for Attorney General, and the owners of a small, local ice cream shop. While the Independent Record may oppose her because she is committed to social justice and a healthy environment, it’s simply irresponsible to depict Haque-Hausrath as anything but a candidate who has drawn support from the whole community.

The transparent agenda behind the IR’s endorsement for Ms. Behlmer (online polls and affirmative action for small business owners notwithstanding) makes it clear once again that the dominant media player in our community is putting politics ahead of the interests of Helena once again.

When you receive your ballot this week and return it by November 8, the choice is clear: vote for the new candidate with policies to improve our community and the energy to engage with all of the community’s citizens.

Vote for Katherine Haque-Hausrath.

You have to wonder just how little respect for its readers the publisher and owners of the Independent Record have. Just months after laying off its local editor and explaining it as a cost-cutting move, the capitol’s paper of record has hired a new editor to oversee the newspaper locally.

Regional editor (a position that makes absolutely no sense) Gerry O’Brien explained the move:

“I’m extremely pleased that Butch accepted the offer to this important post,” said Regional Editor Gerry O’Brien.
“Butch will bring focus to the IR news coverage, driving local content that our readers are demanding.”

None of that seemed to matter in June, when IR publisher Randy Rickman unceremoniously laid off the former editor John Doran, saying that the decision would not impact local news coverage:

Rickman noted that combining management positions between the two companies was a way to “cut costs while still producing the same strong results for our customers.”

It’s hard not to think about 1984 (and not just because I am currently reading it with my students). We’re being asked to believe both that Helena is better served by having an editor with less experience than the previous one–and that the very assertion Rickman made about local editorial control four months ago never happened. It’s all down the memory hole, as if what happened simply never did.

Lee Enterprises and IR publisher Randy Rickman certainly don’t possess the power of Orwell’s Big Brother, but they do share BB’s absolute disregard for those who consume the news. It doesn’t matter what we’re told, because none of it matters in the end. From Orwell’s 1984:

It was merely the substitution of one piece of nonsense for another. Most of the material that you were dealing
with had no connexion with anything in the real world, not even the kind of connexion that is contained in a direct lie.

It’s not hard to read behind the lines and see what really happened here. A publisher with a dual agenda–one corporate and one personal–decided to exercise more control over the newspaper and what better way to demonstrate his power?

This entire sad situation has cost the IR significantly. It has lost a competent editor who was pushing his news staff to write challenging stories and giving them the freedom to do so. More importantly, the paper has lost its credibility. When a media source entrusted with providing the truth to its readers can’t even tell the truth about its own staffing decisions and local control, how exactly are we supposed to trust their word when it comes to anything else.

Twelve hours after first reading today’s Independent Record, I’m still amazed that the editors in Butte felt it appropriate to give an opinion column over to Representative Dennis Rehberg on Labor Day. After searching for an apt analogy to describe just how inappropriate that decision was, I kept coming back to Rehberg. Presumably the IR will next print his insights on Firefighter Appreciation Day or during National Drunk and Drugged Driving Awareness Week.

Only those could be less appropriate.

Contrary to what subdivision ranchers in Congress might think, Labor Day is not the culmination of a month-long taxpayer funded vacation, but a celebration of the importance of the union movement and workers in this country. As the Department of Labor notes, the day is “dedicated to the social and economic achievements of American workers. It constitutes a yearly national tribute to the contributions workers have made to the strength, prosperity, and well-being of our country.”

And that’s what makes printing Rehberg’s pablum today so absurd and so offensive. Throughout his career in government, Rehberg has been hostile to the unions and workers today is meant to celebrate.

His 2010 record best summarizes his hostility towards the labor movement. He opposed the AFL-CIO (0%), the American Federation of Government Employees (0%),  American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees (0%), the  International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers (25%), the  International Brotherhood of Boilermakers (0%), and the Communications Workers of America (0%)—all while pushing for huge benefits to corporations, including those who have moved their workforces overseas.

Specifically, in the just the past few sessions of Congress, he’s voted:

  • against blocking harassment of those who want to form unions.
  • against bargaining rights for workers.
  • against mine safety regulations that save lives.
  • against extension of unemployment benefits.
  • against ending workplace discrimination against woman.
  • against paycheck fairness.
  • against good jobs that prevented unemployment during the recession.

And that’s just a part of his anti-labor record. His lockstep support for the reactionary anti-labor Republican caucus hurts Montana workers and families.

Even if you’ve swallowed the Fox News-led propaganda war against unions and oppose them (along with, I suppose, decent working conditions, vacation time, sick leave, a decent wage, the 40 hour week and all the other reforms labor provided), Rehberg’s hostility towards workers extends past his hostility towards unions.

He’s never on their side, no matter what his rhetoric claims.

Believe in a decent minimum wage? Rehberg fought it and repeatedly voted against increasing it, until it was tied to reductions in estate taxes for millionaires like himself. Hell, he doesn’t even know what the minimum wage is.

Believe your kids should have a chance at a better life with a college degree? Rehberg thinks they’re welfare recipients.

Rehberg is so out of touch, that despite owning millions of dollars worth of inherited property, he told workers—many of them unemployed—that he’s struggling just like them.

When it comes to the working middle class, Rehberg is almost always wrong and almost always against them. His voting record for the middle class is a shameful collection of Fs, perhaps only beaten by his college transcript.

rehberg

Rehberg is right about one thing. American does belong “to the men and women with dirt under their fingernails,” but he’s been doing his best to sell it to the highest bidder, undermining the workers who made this country what it is at every opportunity.

In the end, it’s probably unsurprising that the corporate media would give a day dedicated to labor over to someone who has has supported the company’s anti-union stance and anti-labor policies.

Unions have fought much craftier opponents than Dennis Rehberg and Lee Enterprises, though. We’ll win this fight, win this race, and win back a better future for the real producers of the American Dream.

There are certainly signs that the Independent Record isn’t doing as well financially as its parent company, Lee Enterprises, would like: they’ve downsized staff, fired laid off  their editor(*), and implemented a paywall blocking online content. Today’s paper seems to brazenly demonstrate a new way to increase revenue, offering a news story and opinion piece that are little more than long advertisements for single companies.

First up, we have an outsourced piece from the Montana Standard extolling the virtues of Sylvan Learning Centers. I can’t even imagine what someone felt was newsworthy about the story. Sylvan is an established business in both Helena and Butte, with nothing new to justify a full story.

Even worse, though, was an IR editorial about Blue Cross Blue Shield of Montana. No, it doesn’t discuss the possible dangers of a near-monopoly if BCBS completes its proposed merger with New West. It doesn’t discuss the impact of skyrocketing insurance rates for Montanans. It doesn’t even discuss compensation for the BCBS executives, which grow every year while wages for average Montanans are stagnant.

Instead, it talks about what a great job the company is doing and how hard it is to be the largest insurer in the state.

I’m not naïve enough to think this is the first time that pecuniary interests have motivated coverage in the newspaper; it’s just that it’s rarely been this obvious.

Both stories are a far cry from the paper that was willing to take on St. Peter’s Hospital. I admire the tenacity of the Independent Record when it comes to selling their newspaper. It’s another thing entirely to sell its news.

I actually feel like kind of a jerk for writing this post, but today’s story in the Independent Record about graduation rates in Montana is such an effective example of why a local newspaper needs an on-site editor to ensure accurate, quality information gets to the public that I felt compelled to call attention to it.

In the course of discussing how graduation rates in Helena compare to the rest of the state, the piece presented a badly distorted view of our local schools.

Consider the opening:

In Lewis and Clark County the high school dropout rate is 8. 8 percent; the only counties with higher percentages are Big Horn and Roosevelt.

Helena Superintendent Keith Meyer says the dropout rate is about 15 to 18 percent for high schools here.

Although the article never mentions where the 8.8 percent figure comes from, I’m presuming it’s from the Annie E. Casey Foundation Kids Count report, which relies on data collected in 2008-09—another detail not mentioned in the story. Unfortunately, the story confuses two statistics, suggesting that Helena’s dropout rate is somehow over twice the dropout rate of Lewis and Clark County, and significantly higher than the rest of the state.

The dropout rate is an annual measure while the number described for Helena measures those who do not complete over a four year period. It’s a common mistake, but it’s a hugely significant one in this piece, entirely distorting the picture of graduation rates here in Helena.

Later, the piece contends that increasing the graduation rate could….uh…increase the graduation rate:

Those are exactly the types of changes communities need to explore, says Laura Speer, associate director for policy reform and data at the Annie E. Casey Foundation.

If small indicators improve, such as graduation rates, Montana’s overall ranking could improve.

Statistical mistakes, missing details, and nonsensical claims don’t even complete what’s wrong with this story. It’s also a grammatical and syntactical nightmare, featuring everything from modifier errors to incorrect use of the plural form. And if anyone can make heads or tails of the “quotation” from Superintendent Meyer, I would love to get a translation into English:

“There is a certain percentage of students that there seems to be a mobility rate that is leading us to believe it’s one of the red flags we will be watching,” Meyer said.

Finally, a little additional context that would have been helpful in the story? Both Helena High and Capital High had higher graduation rates for last year’s cohorts, as the OPI web page notes.

I’m not writing this to bash the reporter, but as a frustrated reader who believes that local newspapers need actually inform their readers, not distort their understanding of critical issues.

A newsroom is only going to be able to produce as well as it’s supported. Local editing and adequate staffing matter. Helena absolutely needs to increase the percentage of students who graduate, but we can only have productive discussions about improving the graduation rate when we actually understand what’s going on.

Montana News and their Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad Coverage of Representative Rehberg

30 July 2011

I’d like to thank Pogie for the opportunity to do a little writing on his site. This morning’s story about Dennis Rehberg’s vote yesterday in the House of Representatives makes clear just how bad modern journalism can be.  It’s nothing more than a press release from the Rehberg camp, touting his entirely meaningless vote. What [...]

Read the full article →

An Epically Short-Sighted Move at Lee Enterprises

23 June 2011

The Independent Record is confirming what has been rumored around town for the past 20 hours or so, that Lee Enterprises has decided to consolidate the editorial staffs of the Montana Standard and Helena Independent Record, placing both papers under Standard editor Gerry O’Brien. That means that one of the state’s oldest newspapers, and the [...]

Read the full article →

Let’s Play News, Not News at the Helena Independent Record

13 June 2011

Not News: A national story about Representative Rehberg jeopardizing health, food safety, and tobacco prevention. News: Running a news story about the 12 person Constitution Party’s state convention that included their press release word for word. This, my friends, is news: The Constitution Party of Montana stands without apology in its commitment to the principles [...]

Read the full article →

Health Curriculum OUTRAGE Continues…

24 April 2011

Could someone please explain to me what would make the 14 angry parents who oppose health information being presented to Helena children happy? Would it involve letting them personally create and deliver each day’s curriculum? Perhaps closed-circuit television connections that would allow them watch and then tase any teachers who express an opinion with which [...]

Read the full article →

Huge Credit (And Two Complaints) About the Independent Record

6 April 2011

One of the most read posts I have written on this site was a diatribe about what I thought the Independent Record needed to do to remain relevant and profitable in an environment that has become increasingly challenging for traditional newspapers. At that time, I wrote in part: Take on some of the sacred cows [...]

Read the full article →

When Media Covers Media: That Ol’ Anonymous Source

18 March 2011

I hope visitors will excuse the wonkery of this post, but on a day when I was lectured about journalistic ethics, I thought this little series of articles illustrates the danger of the media covering the media. When KXLH covered the Planned Parenthood protest of the IR Health Fair, they included this detail from an [...]

Read the full article →