Culture

I am not a Dime a Dozen!

by Don Pogreba on May 2, 2012 · 4 comments

in Culture, Education

Among my favorite texts to teach every year in AP Literature is Arthur Miller’s Death of a Salesman, which never fails to move me—and even occasionally has the same impact on teenagers who seem a bit more jaded than I am. I’ve had students weep in the last few moments of the play while we read it aloud, when Willy, the protagonist of the play, is confronted by his eldest son Bif.

If you haven’t read or seen the play, do yourself a favor and skip over this clip until you’ve had a chance to do so.

 

Lee Siegel, writing in the New York Time, worries that audiences today might not see the characters the way that Miller intended:

Mr. Miller’s outrage at a capitalist system he wanted to humanize has become our cynical adaptation to a capitalist system we pride ourselves on knowing how to manipulate. For Mr. Miller, Willy’s middle-class dreams put the system that betrayed them to shame. In our current context, Willy’s dreams of love, dignity and community through modest work make him a deluded loser.

Perhaps there is a simple, unlovely reason “Death of a Salesman” has become such a beloved institution. Instead of humbling its audience through the shock of recognition, the play now confers upon the people who can afford to see it a feeling of superiority — itself a fragile illusion.

I know some students react to the play in the way that Siegel describes, struggling to see him as a tragic figure because his dreams seem so mundane. The play breaks my heart because Willy, flawed though he is, represents values that still awfully important to me—an honest day’s work, building a little something for your family, and hoping for something better.

With the welcome news that the Department of Justice plans to investigate the handling of eighty rape reports in Missoula over the past few years, most officials in Missoula responded favorably, happy that the additional resources and expertise of the Department of Justice can help the city get a handle on the crisis.

Rather than welcoming the additional resources and opportunity to improve Missoula’s legal response to a culture that has enabled rape, County Attorney Fred Van Valkenburg decided to attack the Department of Justice, in a rant that would not have been out of place during the 2011 Montana Legislature:

Fred Van Valkenburg denounced that action as an overreach by “the heavy hand of the federal government,” and insisted that his office has done nothing wrong.

That last line would be entirely correct, if only the word “wrong” were removed. The response to the series of sexual assaults in Missoula has been entirely inadequate and even damaging to women, as perpetrators have been allowed to flee the jurisdiction, charges have not been filed, and women have been told that their claims could very well be false.

Van Valkenburg

criticized Justice Department officials for refusing to explain what triggered the investigation and said they’re “essentially sending a message to every local prosecutor in America” that they can be second-guessed. “That’s wrong, and undermines the dedicated hard work prosecutors are doing across America to fight crime.”

Actually, prosecutors get second-guessed all the time. It’s the nature of our legal system, which has multiple levels of appeals precisely because of issues like prosecutorial misconduct. That the Department of Justice feels the need to investigate the failures of law enforcement and prosecutors in Missoula, a decision supported by Missoula’s police chief and mayor, is far more important than Mr.Van Valkenburg’s ego.

Missoula needs to become safe for women again. That’s the bottom line. A legal culture that has permitted sexual assault and minimized its impact on individuals and the community as a whole absolutely demands scrutiny, something Mr.Van Valkenburg seems entirely incapable of.

Monday Morning Mental Mix

by Don Pogreba on June 6, 2011 · 4 comments

in Culture, Education, The Media

Monday Morning Mental Mix is a collection of articles I stumbled across during the preceding week, not necessarily articles written or published in the past seven days. It will generally be an eclectic collection of items that made it into my Diigo feed or onto Instapaper. If you have any great articles to share, please feel free to send them my way.

Eric Alterman argues that that the collapse of the newspaper industry and proliferation of think tank experts had led to a dramatic expansion of “ideologically motivated misinformation.” He places the blame on journalists: “journalists, on the other hand, usually treat anything as true if someone in a position of ostensible authority is willing to say it, even anonymously (and if no one is going to sue over it). The accuracy of anyone’s statement, particularly if that person is a public official, is often deemed irrelevant.”

Kim Brooks criticizes the practice of high school English, suggesting that soft discussion about literature and diminished focus on writing has left students unprepared for college, but acknowledges that the math of grading papers makes teaching writing a challenge: “every English teacher teaches five sections of English, and each section has approximately 25 students — a dream load compared to what teachers at, say, a Chicago public face. But that still means a three-page formal essay assignment would translate into 375 pages of student prose to be read, critiqued and evaluated. The very thought makes a cold, dark dread creep across my soul.”

Philosopher Sam Harris forces us to consider simplistic answers about free will and morality, arguing that “free will is a non-starter, both philosophically and scientifically.” Later in the piece, he asks “Consider what would happen if we discovered a cure for human evil. Imagine, for the sake of argument, that every relevant change in the human brain can be made cheaply, painlessly, and safely. The cure for psychopathy can be put directly into the food supply like vitamin D. Evil is now nothing more than a nutritional deficiency.”

The mere existence of trailers for books is astonishing to me, but some of winners and losers of the 2011 Moby Awards offered even more surprise. I didn’t enjoy Jonathan Franzen’s Freedom at all, but his promotional trailer almost redeemed the book.

Peter Schrag argues in The Nation that vouchers are back with a vengeance, the “ ultimate weapon in our educational debates, always ticking just under the surface, never quite going off. But after last November’s Republican statehouse victories, the right, sometimes abetted by Democrats and liberals, has brought back vouchers and school privatization with a vengeance.”

I thought I’d take a break from my fanatical posting about the Montana Legislature and take a moment to write about my first love, books. Today’s post is about the three books that, after a lifetime of reading, I love more than any others, and would recommend that everyone read.

I’d love to see what books others would choose as well.

Walden by Henry David Thoreau

Nothing I’ve ever read has as much truth for me as Thoreau’s classic. My first paperback copy was so thoroughly highlighted and annotated by my furious scribbling and battered from being carried in my backpack that it quite literally disintegrated. Forget what you remember from reading excerpts in high school; whether it’s his love of the natural world or his keen insight into the triviality that we consume our lives, Thoreau better explains life than any other writer I know.

“However mean your life is, meet it and live it; do not shun it and call it hard names.”

Resurrection by Leo Tolstoy

I’m not a particularly religious person and Tolstoy lays on his vision of Christianity thickly at the end of the book, but nothing in fiction has resonated as powerfully for me as this story about a man’s struggle to become a a good person. Tolstoy’s protagonist, Nekhlyudov, doesn’t have an epiphany one day and become a better man; instead, like all of us, he fails and succeeds in each moment. As much as I love Anna Karenina and War and Peace, Resurrection is the pinnacle of Tolstoy’s work for me. Bitterly satirical and yet full of hope about humans, Resurrection shows not just how weak and selfish we can be, but how much better we can become.

“And all this terrible change had come about because he had ceased to believe himself and had taken to believing others.”

Twenty Love Poems and a Song of Despair by Pablo Neruda
I have two strong feelings when I read Neruda: a sense of awe and a question about why anyone should ever bother to write about the human heart ever again, because Neruda said everything there is to say. I’m not sure there is much difference between Thoreau (the lifelong virgin) and Neruda (the sensualist): both knew that life was about living without reservation or hesitation.
“Here I love you.
In the dark pines the wind disentangles itself.
The moon glows like phosphorous on the vagrant waters.
Days, all one kind, go chasing each other.”

It’s finally time to recognize the real suffering of the recession: socialites who have to wear old dresses to social events and stay at home mothers who asked their husbands to cut back on jewelry purchases at Christmas. The horror!

One can only hope that these voices will be recorded for posterity, the way we recorded the oral history of those who experienced the Great Depression.

10 Year Old Dresses!

It is a sign of the times when Sacha Taylor, a fixture on the charity circuit in this gala-happy city, digs out a 10-year-old dress to wear to a recent society party.

Free Story Time Instead of the Museum!

Holly Moreno, 30, a part-time Web site manager in the Dallas suburb of Rowlett, Tex., whose husband is a business analyst, said she had been taking their 2-year-old son to indoor playgrounds at the mall and free story-times at the library instead of paying to get into the children’s museum, their favorite wintertime haunt.

Less Jewelry at Christmas!

Kim Gatlin, a novelist who lives in Park Cities, in the Dallas area, said some of her friends had urged their husbands not to give them jewelry over the holidays. “They were like, you know, ‘There’s nothing I’m dying for right now — let’s just wait,’ ” she said. “It makes them feel like they’re participating, although they don’t contribute to the income stream.”

Back in the real world, families are being forced out of their homes, people are losing their jobs, students are having to limit their educational choices, and food banks are struggling to meet the needs of their communities.

Did Shaila Dewan at the Times ever consider the possibility that the ‘decadent’ lifestyles of some of the people she profiled might just be related to the economic downturn? Maybe the culture of excess and transfer of wealth to the richest Americans in the past twenty years have contributed to the financial instability we are experiencing?

Not to worry. We’re all in it together:

“It’s disrespectful to the people who don’t have much to flaunt your wealth,” said Monica Dioda Hagedorn, 40, a lawyer in Atlanta who is married to an heir of the Scotts Miracle-Gro fortune. “I have plenty of dresses to last me 10 years.”

Ms. Hagedorn said she did not hold herself apart from the rest of society because of her money. “Everyone’s going to pull through together, or everyone’s going to sink together,” she said.

Sweet. I’ll see you at the club this weekend, Monica.

Weekend Time Waster: Your Bookstore Bookshelf

March 7, 2009

I’ve always loved those little corners in small bookstores (or even the chains) where the books are prominently placed not because some corporate publisher paid the store a premium, but simply because someone loved the book. Maybe the book was placed as a treasured classic that the person returned to time and time again, or [...]

Read the full article →

Is 8 too young an age to marry?

August 26, 2008

That’s a big yes. BBC reported that an 8-year-old girl was preparing to go to court to get a divorce.  A court in Saudi Arabia is reported to be preparing to hear a plea for divorce from an eight-year-old girl who has been married off to a man in his 50s. The Saudi newspaper al-Watan [...]

Read the full article →

It’s more than just clothes.

July 20, 2008

Democracy and a Piece of Clothing – The Washington Post A Muslim immigrant from Morocco was trying to attain citizenship in France. She wore a burqa. Her wearing of the burqa was not the issue though, officials say. It was her unwillingness to comply with any of the exceptions that the French government was trying to give [...]

Read the full article →